I’m wondering how newish Feliks EVO would compare as it is an evolution of the Euphoria platform with some boutique bits, right? and if this could flip the paradigm.I don't disagree wtih this review. It says:
"Compared to the HA2-SF, the new one, the Euforia is a bit slower, smoother, warmer. Body-wise they’re actually very similar, but the HA2-SE is more neutral, more spacious, cleaner and more energetic. Especially the top end of the Euforia is softer compared to the HA2-SF (it’s more like the HA2-SE).
The Euforia and the HA2-SE/SF each have things they’re really good at, but if I have to rank them I would say SF > Euforia > SE. You could however prefer the more tubish sound of the Euforia, but looking at the technicalities, the Auris Audio HA2-SF is the clear winner in my humble opinion"
Now, ignore the writer's conclusion, which is already based on a preference, and look at the actual comparison of character, that is pretty spot on. For the more tube like OTL sound that is smoother and warmer, go with the Euforia. For that more clean and neutral linear amplification go with the Auris.
It depends what you are looking for!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The (Un)Official Amp Thread For ZMF Headphones
- Thread starter Monsterzero
- Start date
I’m wondering how newish Feliks EVO would compare as it is an evolution of the Euphoria platform with some boutique bits, right? and if this could flip the paradigm.
I only ever heard the new EVO. Purely guess, but I'm pretty sure they'd all sound similar.