- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Posts
- 191
- Likes
- 67
What setup provides the T1 maximum huge soundstage( esp. vertically) & great airy qualities..
Amps or amps in particular combination of Dacs
Amps or amps in particular combination of Dacs
What setup provides the T1 maximum huge soundstage( esp. vertically) ..
Amps or amps in particular combination of Dacs
How big is T1's soundstage when compared to HD800's?
80%?90% as big?
What setup provides the T1 maximum huge soundstage( esp. vertically) & great airy qualities..
Amps or amps in particular combination of Dacs
What setup provides the T1 maximum huge soundstage( esp. vertically) & great airy qualities..
Amps or amps in particular combination of Dacs
That's a tough question. How do you put a percentage on it? I mean, if the HD800 represents "100%" than what is 0%? I'm going to try to answer, since I own both, but I'm sure there's going to be a lot of disagreement!
DEPTH - I'd say the T1 has equal or greater depth compared to the HD800. More than any other headphone I've tried, the music really seems way out in front of you with the T1. Honestly, IMO, it's the T1's most impressive characteristic. If HD800's depth is rated at 100%, I'd say the T1 is maybe 110% - it's just a touch more.
HEIGHT - The height is really good here, but the HD800 seems to do a little more with the vertical space. The images in the HD800 seem to be larger and taller compared to the T1. That being said, different sound images stack & layer well within the T1's vertical space. I'd say 85% is fair. If I'm comparing it to TVs, the T1 is like watching it on a 42" TV and the HD800 is like watching it on a 50" TV. Neither one has a better picture, the images are just larger on the 50". YMMV, of course, especially since we didn't really define what 0% is.
WIDTH - The HD800 is incredibly wide. The T1 is more like "well above average". I'd say the 85% is about right here too, depending on your basis for comparison. Much like I said with the height, the sound images stack and layer well horizontally, as well. The space, though a bit smaller physically, is incredibly well used on the T1. Sound images have a very specific, well-defined spot in the soundstage. The incredible depth seems to have an effect here, as the music is coming from in front of you more with the T1, rather than all around you with the HD800. The angled drivers make it different by design, which obscures the comparison a little bit.
So, TL;DR version (or summary for those keeping score), the T1's soundstage is 93.333% the size of the HD800's. IMO, YMMV, etc.
John Grandberg on the T1:
http://parttimeaudiophile.com/2015/07/04/review-beyerdynamic-t-1-headphone/
I can relate to most of his points actually
You should check out Darrin Fong's "Out of Your Head" software. It simulates different speaker setups in your headphones for an experience that is truly, truly weird. You'll definitely take your headphones off to check if your speakers are on! Anyway, I've found the T1 to be the best match for it, out of all the headphones I've tried. It definitely ups your soundstage game to a new level.
There are pre-rendered demo videos here: https://fongaudio.com/demo/
I'm not sure if I should get the T1 or Audeze LCD 2. I mostly listen to rock and classical. Really like a clean acoustic record too. Any pointers which headphone would suit the best? I'm planning on a Little Dot mk vi as amp.
I'm not sure if I should get the T1 or Audeze LCD 2. I mostly listen to rock and classical. Really like a clean acoustic record too. Any pointers which headphone would suit the best? I'm planning on a Little Dot mk vi as amp.