Sabre2
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2016
- Posts
- 378
- Likes
- 400
@Kiats Added anything to your FitEar collection?
@Kiats Added anything to your FitEar collection?
@Kiats Added anything to your FitEar collection?
Haha! Interesting hypothesis but no. Nothing to do with waiting for anything else. If not, I would not have bothered to go down to try out the demo units. It's more a case that when you have the main TOTL models, adding any more would require that any additional FitEar IEMs would have to be sufficiently differentiated from existing ones and add sonic value to the current range of IEMs.
i was wondering why the air was not there?
i was wondering why the air was not there?
Fitear Fitear was not there as well, I think its available to order but Jaben doesnt have a demo unit.
One can't but wonder if it is symptomatic that the Singapore market no longer figures as much in FitEar's plans...
It's really just the same issue with small Japanese companies not having the proper energy and enthusiasm to push the overseas market that are much smaller than their domestic Japanese market
I believe Fitear does a lot of more sell in China than in Japan.
To Anakchan: I strongly believe it is Fitear's duty to monitor and control how their local distributors handles their customers regarding delivery as well as after sales services, so no, I don't believe the blame is misdirected at all as this is common business practice (distribution/partnership deals can change hands any moment when it comes to business interest). If a customer writes directly to Fitear to complain about the mishandling of Fitear products by their local distributors, then it is Fitear's duty and best interest to follow up whether the complaint is true or not and take appropriate action, not throw their hands up and say "not our problem, deal with the local distributors yourself" (which was basically what I had experienced when purchasing my 335s two years ago - even when I communicate to them via Japanese)
That is a very black & white way of thinking. The distributor is very much a customer to the manufacturer as end user is a customer to the distributor. You're only partially right that the manufacturer is to assess the distributor & if the distributor doesn't perform to the manufacturer's expectations for the manufacturer to find & move to another distributor.
But if the distributor is mass collecting orders to save on bulk shipping & prepared to make their customers wait, & not paying the manufacturer in a timely manner for the orders, how is the manufacturer be entirely responsible for delays? The end consumer overseas is clearly paying more than what the product costs in Japan cos the distributor is getting their percentage. End users feel the distributor has no responsibility for that percentage they collect?