ButtUglyJeff
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2011
- Posts
- 2,904
- Likes
- 376
It sounds a lot like my LA D5K, which also sounds rather nice at louder Volumes, as at lower Dbs the bass can get a little over whelming
....as does my LA TH600
It sounds a lot like my LA D5K, which also sounds rather nice at louder Volumes, as at lower Dbs the bass can get a little over whelming
Yeah, I was the one that posted that link. Still on backorder, which prompted me to e-mail them since Sony got out of backorder already and readily available for purchase.
Kinda tempted to head to downtown Toronto to see if they have a demo to listen, but I kinda want to surprise myself.
It's called the 'Fletcher-Munson curve' and the phenomenon is similar with both loudspeakers and headphones.
This is why the Z7's mid-bass hump isn't a total deal-breaker for me (though, I still have yet to hear them) because I tend to listen to my music at higher than average listening levels, so that should help compensate for the somewhat heavy mid-bass and soft highs that the Z7's are reported to have.
Youre not being the "bad boy". You're saying how much you hate an SUV when you're clearly in the market for a mini scooter. There are different types of headphones and this clearly isn't your type.
Any chance that was a t spot called Halo Nightclub (now known as the Bower)?
Is it that hard, all these years later to just give us a MDR R10 improved variant?
Would be interested to hear from Oregonian again. He has a great collection of closed backs to compare too
I will try to describe the sound. The album Island by Bear's Den (stream here) is an album where the band uses background instruments to plan a mosaic of sounds that frame the vocals. Bear’s Den wraps the music in dense reverberation on songs that include keyboards or strings often with low frequency sounds, some of them subtle, but present.
A decent headphone (and I have tried several like B&O Beoplay H6, VModa M-80, Sony XBA-2, Beyer T70p, Ety ER4P), will be able to separate the various sounds of the background music while keeping the voices upfront and dominant as it is the singing what drives the melody of the song.
When you play this album with the Z7 it highlights all the defects of this can. First, the background mosaic of sounds become a monotone sound where instead of appreciating the beauty of the mixed sounds you just get a constant blur of sound. This is due to the enhanced frequency range of the Z7 from 40-200 Hz that screws up the texture of sounds in the album. In addition, the receded mids in the Z7, due in part to the resonance of the low frequencies and bleed into the mid range, will present the voices lifeless and flat, without any presence, blended with the blurred sounds in the background. In addition, the "polite" high frequencies of the Z7 don't help much to add any spark to the music. So, the result is a blur of monotonic sound with terrible instrument separation, continuous resonance, and lifeless music. On top of this the Z7 gets to do the impossible, it makes good music to feel boring.
This is what I describe as intolerable for a $700 can. Any other one of my headphones, with different degree, are able to play this album with a different style between them, but much better than the Z7.
The Z7 is a flawed can that will be forgotten very soon. As soon as the hype passes away it will be remembered as a failed intent by Sony to make an audiophile headphone.
I am amazed about anyone who describes this can as an audiophile headphone and claims that it has very good resolution, dynamics and technicalities. I appreciate that we all can have different opinions, and each one's brain and ears integrate the sounds differently, but this is not an audiophile headphone worth its price.
And believe me I don't have anything against Sony, I love Sony as a brand and I have several Sony headphones. I also cherish their desired to get serious into High Res audio and make better products for people like us, who get nuts about quality sound. This is what makes the Z7 so disappointing. It is a beautiful headphone, very well crafted, extremely comfortable, made in Japan, a land of good taste for quality sound, and they designed a flawed product. So disappointing.
I said enough and I don't want to become the "bad boy" against the MDR Z7, so this may be my last post in this thread. I have the headphone in my home, and gave it a good try, and much to my dislike I will return it. I hate to return things, and I try to convince myself of a single reason to keep it but I can't find any.
My last pice of advise. For anyone burning in desire to buy the MDR Z7, please make sure to get it from a vendor with a good return policy, you may need it.
I'm curious to whether increasing the volume on a headphone like the Z7, the measurable db for the high and low frequencies become more balanced with the mid-range.
Oh yeah, they are 3-pole.
Is it that hard, all these years later to just give us a MDR R10 improved variant?
again what I heard in my limited session, was that my 7550s were significantly more balanced. Primarily, the bass seemed quite accentuated, which could muddy the sound on many recordings. Was not quite expecting that type if tuning. I've let a number of non headfiers try more neutrally curved headphones and they all liked them. Why would Sony tune a headphone in such a way? Perhaps Sony only market tested this headphone for dubstep listeners.
Also regards the Fletcher-Munson curve, the idea of designing a v-shaped headphone (with bass and highs accented) is to aid for low level listening - similar to a 'loudness' eq setting. I'm curious to whether increasing the volume on a headphone like the Z7, the measurable db for the high and low frequencies become more balanced with the mid-range.
Would be interested to hear from Oregonian again. He has a great collection of closed backs to compare too
LOL. That's par for the course when it comes to Sony. The only thing they make money on these days is insurance, property sales and the Spider Man movies.