Maybe as a result of the review mentioned in
@GU1DO's post above, we shouldn't be so surprised and disappointed.
The reviewer says he saw Realiser A16 at CanJam three years ago, then every following year and ignored it every time. Now, being asked by an owner, he agreed to do a review, without having the slightest idea what to expect. I think the reviewer ignored Realiser A16 for three years in a row because he was hunting big names at CanJam. Actually, who the hell was Smyth Research for him? Some petty manufacturers.
Leaving aside the eccentricities of the reviewer, one can ask what an honest reviewer (not an owner) could do with a Realiser A16? How could he / she cope with a rather sophisticated device given that the site and the product manual are quite difficult to understand. In addition, the manufacturer of the device is not quite communicative.
It seems that there is still a way out of this odd situation. The condition is to be a French speaking person. Actually, Gilles Gerin - Smyth Research's French partner is much more present online to promote Realiser A16. As a result, a decent review for the Realiser A16 was recently posted at a website in France:
Smyth Realiser A16 test: your home cinema room modelled identically for listening through headphones
http://www.dvdcritiques.com/Actus/4482
I am quite convinced that Gilles Gerin was involved in that review, otherwise it would have been difficult for the reviewer to discern among all details involved in using Realiser A16 as it was designed.
In conclusion, I think it would be desirable for Smyth Research to be a bit more communicative and not to end up in an ivory tower.