TheBoss
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2007
- Posts
- 437
- Likes
- 38
Just ordered for $249. Can't wait to hook 'em up with RSA 71-B.
So far, IE80 was keeping me busy. Let's see how Sony compares with Sennheiser.
Just ordered for $249. Can't wait to hook 'em up with RSA 71-B.
So far, IE80 was keeping me busy. Let's see how Sony compares with Sennheiser.
Awesome! Wonder how you pulled this little stunt!!! *very impressed*
Lol. I didn't realize how flat these were.
Once an EX1000 owner long ago.
I didn't feel that the EX1000 was very bright overall. The main issue I think is the strong peak in the low treble, there are a couple of little peaks too, less problematic. The big peak drove me crazy, but I think I listen fairly loud.
For comparison, when I demoed the 7550, I didn't think it was that neutral. It sounded too dark, almost like someone had applied a general cut to the treble of the ex1k. There is still some relative rise in the lower treble, a resonance that throws off the tone.
The high treble extension of the EX1000 wasn't impressive, but the 7550 was disappointing.
How long do I need to burn them in
I have ex800st and I agree with most of your opinions, but I don't think it is good at female vocal.
I think this is the IEM make you enjoy your musics.
Once an EX1000 owner long ago.
I didn't feel that the EX1000 was very bright overall. The main issue I think is the strong peak in the low treble, there are a couple of little peaks too, less problematic. The big peak drove me crazy, but I think I listen fairly loud.
For comparison, when I demoed the 7550, I didn't think it was that neutral. It sounded too dark, almost like someone had applied a general cut to the treble of the ex1k. There is still some relative rise in the lower treble, a resonance that throws off the tone.
The high treble extension of the EX1000 wasn't impressive, but the 7550 was disappointing.