[Mimouille]

Has anybody else had problems with the cable and adjustment screws? I had one bad screw out of the box and now the second one doesn't seem to work either after less than a month. It doesn't seem like the tiny screwdriver is the exact right size for the pots. My dealer, Moon audio, has offered to replace the cable after I return the original to him. 

I never really had a bad screw, except maybe the first time.

 

[M Coupe]

Regarding the adjustment screws.  I don't own the Roxanne but always wondered how you would keep the screw balance between the two channels?  Is the screw indexed so you can count clicks or is full min/max the only way to be really sure.  I may be naive in assuming that it matters to keep both channels balanced.  
 
Thank you.

 

[bearFNF]

  Regarding the adjustment screws.  I don't own the Roxanne but always wondered how you would keep the screw balance between the two channels?  Is the screw indexed so you can count clicks or is full min/max the only way to be really sure.  I may be naive in assuming that it matters to keep both channels balanced.  
 
Thank you.

Only way is to use yours ears really.  You can get it very close using the scale and slots of the adjuster, though.

These are not lined up at all, by the way.
 

 

[headwhacker]

  Regarding the adjustment screws.  I don't own the Roxanne but always wondered how you would keep the screw balance between the two channels?  Is the screw indexed so you can count clicks or is full min/max the only way to be really sure.  I may be naive in assuming that it matters to keep both channels balanced.  
 
Thank you.

 
 

 
Only way is to use yours ears really.  You can get it very close using the scale and slots of the adjuster, though.

These are not lined up at all, by the way.
 

 
Get a cheap DMM. so you can get as accurate as possible.

 

[level3]

  Has anybody else had problems with the cable and adjustment screws?

 
Have left the the 'settings' on mine around 10-o'clock-ish since I acquired it. Just turned both screws round-and-back with the tool provided = does not take much force = boost function working fine.
 
Anyway, thanks for the heads-up. Please post on how it goes with your replacement unit. 
 
Cheers.

 

[frisiviti]

I have had my Roxanne for a few months, but it never really sounded very good compared to my other IEMs.  The sound is always very full-bodied, but it sounds almost like the high and low frequencies are not there.
 
Has anyone ran into this issue?  This is true while listening with either my portable or desktop setups.

 

[doki81]

  I have had my Roxanne for a few months, but it never really sounded very good compared to my other IEMs.  The sound is always very full-bodied, but it sounds almost like the high and low frequencies are not there.
 
Has anyone ran into this issue?  This is true while listening with either my portable or desktop setups.

have you check the sealing of your Roxanne..are they on good seal?

 

[frisiviti]

  have you check the sealing of your Roxanne..are they on good seal?

 
The seal is good.  I have the custom version (carbon fiber shells), so not sure if there were issues there.
 
The IEMs work, but they just don't sound better than my much cheaper IEMs, including my Sony EX1000 and JVC FX850.  In fact, they almost sound veiled in comparison.

 

[ascension278]

what are u using as ur source/DAC/Amp?

Pairing Roxannes with a warm source makes it sound muddy.

 

[adammax]

The seal is good.  I have the custom version (carbon fiber shells), so not sure if there were issues there.

The IEMs work, but they just don't sound better than my much cheaper IEMs, including my Sony EX1000 and JVC FX850.  In fact, they almost sound veiled in comparison.

Can you describe more on the Roxanne sound signature? U may compare relative to the fx850.

 

[windwolf447]

The seal is good.  I have the custom version (carbon fiber shells), so not sure if there were issues there.

The IEMs work, but they just don't sound better than my much cheaper IEMs, including my Sony EX1000 and JVC FX850.  In fact, they almost sound veiled in comparison.

For me the high and low and everything is there and I can hear quite a lot more details from Roxanne than Fx850. The soundstage and positioning is also much better. The bass is also stronger . Maybe you just don't really like Roxanne's sound signature

 

[Aryaramanan7]

The DHC cables for Roxanne are just around the corner. In another 2 weeks from now they shall start receiving orders. Please check DHC Facebook page, for details!

 

[DrSheep]

FYI, I just got the new TOTL Silver Widow cable from Toxic Cable. Will test it out tonigh .

 

[DrSheep]

Here it is:
 
7 bands, cable, and tuning tool.

 
Bass tuning ports on y-splitter.  The original design call for the points being on the plug, but was revised to the splitter for ease of repair.  Note that the 12 O'Clock position is actually on the 9 O'Clock position of the splitter, which is different than the stock cable.

 
Tuning port tool.

 
The top of the tuning port tool mirrors the setting of the port, so you can see the setting when you adjust.

 
All installed and ready to go.  The new straight plug is very solid.

 

[DatGuy]

did you have to provide your roxanne cables so Toxic could use the connectors?
 
DHC's facebook page says they'll be the first to get Roxanne connectors from JH next week, and not the chinese copies that lunashops had