My AKG comparison K7XX, K712, 65th Annies and the rest! to stop this confusion!
May 27, 2019 at 7:25 AM Post #62 of 80
Still to this day people are confused about these headphones. They will state they all sound the same which is totally incorrect. The topic has been covered so many times so I'm making this thread/review to try help with the confusion.

Firstly I'm going to start with my personal findings on the differences between the Q701 and K701 and how they apply to the 65th Annie, K7XX and K712 Pro.

Right...deep breath!

K701

The K701 is a lean, bright headphone. The peaks in the upper mids are prominent giving them this artificial presence in this range. This can make the mids as a whole sound uneven. The bass is not neutral it drops offs making them sound very detailed the mid-high frequencies. This makes them great for games or anything needing a super wide soundstage. The stage is artificial though, it seems endless with no definition. The sound as a whole is dry and harsh it's almost a horrible sounding headphone to my ears for music, but rather nice for open world games.

K702

The difference are almost not even noticeable but my annoyingly sensitive to detail ears found the soundstage to be ever so slightly smaller and an ever so slightly more present low end. Apart from that the headphones are pretty much identical in tone, dryness and detail and everthing else. The minute difference are not even worth speaking about to be honest but I'd be lying if I said these were 100% the same, this could be production variation though.

Q701

The Q's added a bit more bass bringing them about neutral or maybe slightly below. Mids sound more balanced due to the upper mid peak being tamed. It seems to show it's self in a minor way with harsh recordings. The treble seems about right, it's not super bright like the K701 and it's a slightly warmer headphone overall making it suitable for genres of music although not quite as versatile as I like. The final result of this headphone is a smoother listening experience with a more controlled soundstage without losing too much detail Don't get me wrong, I'm saying the Q701 is a smooth headphone, it's a SMOOTHER version of the driver. Directly compared, you can tell they share the same driver but the Q701 is a better version for music.

Original K702 65th Anniversaries(Small Pads)

Don't let the K702 in the name fool you! It's based on the Q701 version of the K7 series driver as opposed to the K701 or K702. First thing I noticed when I put the Q701 pads on the Annie was they sound the same but noticed a slight warmth in the Annies driver. This could again, be production variation or handpicked drivers for the Annie. The warmth isn't a big deal but it's there and it's noticeable if you have a good ear for differences. I came away happy with the result that the Annie stripped down is the Q701 and not the peaky K701 or K702. The original pads give the Q701 a forward up close and almost fatigue free sound; think Sennheiser HD650, LCD2 forward but with a bit more obvious detail and a more spacious soundstage. The treble is more rolled off but still present keeping some detail and the bass was boosted adding extra warmth adding a more pleasant sound and eliminating the extra dryness the Q701 didn't catch from the K701. The final result is smoother, intimate, smoother sound.

AKG K712 Pro

Before these came out, people straight away were saying these are the 65th Annies. I mean it made sense because other companies have done the same thing; i.e Sennheiser HD580 Jubilee which was the HD600. The thing people didn't remember though was that the 65th Annie got a lot of complaints from people who enjoyed the older models because the loss of soundstage, detail due to it's lush; creamier and more rolled off sound compared to the other AKG's. The K712 again, first thing place some Q701 pads on them to see the result..Ouch, so dry, so harsh but super airy and extended! straight away they reminded me of the K701/K702.

With the K712 pads back on the warmth found in the Annie was almost present, it's not 100% identical. I found the Annie to go a bit lower while the K712 had a bit more presence. The K712 keeps a dryish nature here due to it's prominent peaks and treble. The actual treble is slightly more subdued than the K701/K702 because of the memory foam pads. The peaks seems artificially enhanced to keep detail that would otherwise disappear due to the more air killing pads of the K712. The mids on this headphone due to the more extended treble and peaky upper mids sound thin and lacking body compared to it's blue and grey sister, the 65th Annie. The lower mids are pushed back more making voices sound less up front.
One thing I noticed was the foams on the inside were different to the Q701, Annie. It was more dense with less pockets.

I decided to put the Q701 foams in, the result was the bass didn't seem as present compared to the K712 foam. Again not a massive issue, but noticeable.
The problem I had with this headphone was that while it's the best gaming headphone I've ever had due to it's ability to be an all rounder; it was just too sharp for my ears and I prefer a more liquid, smoother presentation. Those who like the airy, detailed nature of the K701 but want a bit more bass will like the K712.

AKG K702 65th Anniversaries 2nd revision(K712 pads)

Not really a revision as it wasn't documented by AKG. They decided to change the pads, maybe because the lack of air and lack of typical AKG character with the first Annie or they simply just wanted consistency. The sound has changed a bit, it's still smooth, still fairly intimate. Not quite as lush and upfront as the Old Annie. It's a change for the better technically because, it's a bit more spacious and extended. I Purchased the old Annie recently to refresh my memory. It still has the smooth nature but the peak seems a bit more visible in hot recordings but it's still not a problem.
Mids are intimate but not as intimate as the old Annie. Bass sounds the same in presence and impact. Imaging is the same, that's one thing that remains constant is the K7 series driver's ability to image even though the older Annie was darker. Those who found the K712 too dry or harsh or the old Annie too intimate will like this version better. Overall sound, smooth, detailed, good soundstage but still not as good as the K712, neutral bass, slightly warm. Just to add the Q701 pads on these still show the slight extra warmth but is 98% or so the same.

AKG K7XX Massdrop edition

The biggest confusion so far is these. People are asking are these the K712 or the Annie? I'm going to say right now, they are the Annie, which is the Q701. For those who want it clearer

Q701 + K712 Pads = 65th Annie =K7XX

Everything I mentioned in the 2nd Annie revision page is the same as these. The only difference is the Writing on the buttons and the caps isn't raised, it's printed. Everything else feels the same regardless of the China move.

Now just to add something else about the K712. It's not confirmed because AKG say they are a different driver, but the K712 I believe is just the K701/K702 driver with slight difference like a more boosted mid peak and extension up top. It sounds like it's just a simple tune rather than a completely new driver. It's still a K7 in the same so it's pretty much the same surely? I'm sticking to my opinion and findings in that the K712 is the K701 with the more dense foam to bring the bass up over the K701 to assist the memory foam pads with the presence and bass texture. Finally a more prominent peak and treble so detail doesn't get lost in the warmth.

Again with the Q701 foam the bass becomes leaner.

I hope this helps, everything from this write up is purely off my experience. I'm a big gamer, I love AKG for gaming, I've owned them all multiple times and have spent a long time comparing them all.


I have both the K7XX and K712 Pro and on the above.

1. The K7xx does NOT run the K712 Pro pads. The K712 Pro Pads are way deeper and firmer.
2. Because of the depth it seems to me the soundstage is widely splayed on K7XX and it can be putting off as hard-panned sounds seem to come from the edges of the ears and its distracting. The K712 Pro's soundstage is way better with less spread and more depth
3. K7XX is warmer in sound and the FR curves show that too with elevation of Bass across upper / mid bass
4. K712 Pro is more colored on mids because of the 2khz spikes and some other dips

Overall these are different headphones. Choose K7xx for a euphonic warmer easy sound but I would always choose K712 Pro for critical listening and correct its quirks with the superb profile that Sonarworks has. K712 Pro with Sonarworks is incredible - it shows of its fast drivers to such an extent that I'm beat on finding a better headphone except say for HD800. I would always plump for K712 Pro and its worth its premium price any day.

I must also say that I kept my K7xx the soundstage of which while disconcertingly wide is yet a easy plug and play euphonic fun HP.
 
May 27, 2019 at 11:02 AM Post #63 of 80
My experience - and often tested:
Q701 + K712 Pro Pads = K712

From all K/Q87xx headphones I like Q701 with its original pads!
 
Last edited:
Aug 8, 2019 at 7:27 PM Post #65 of 80
Owners, based on your experience, which one of these 3 is the most accurate when it comes to pinpointing sound sources in 3D space in FPS games? For locating footsteps and gunshots?(aka imaging). I have been going in circles for weeks with so many mixed opinions.

-AKG K712
-AKG K702
-HE-4XX
-AD 900x

Thank you
 
Aug 8, 2019 at 7:54 PM Post #66 of 80
K712 has more bass than the K702 which might give the impression of smaller sound stage and less precise imaging, but really, neither headphone is better or worse than the other, just slightly different sounding. Personally I prefer the K702, and use it often for watching movies.
 
Aug 8, 2019 at 10:12 PM Post #67 of 80
K7xx/K712 have more accurate 3D soundstage. Difference is quite a big. One of the best stage you can have.
AKG K501 was the best stage i have ever heard.

Which gives a sense of huge stage. Sorry, but huger stage does not mean more accurate. Well, the actual hugest stage was from Solderdude mod AKG k551. It was out of reach amount of stage.K7xx/K712 have more accurate 3D soundstage. Difference is quite a big. One of the best stage you can have.
I'm confused. I'm thinking of staging a walkout.
 
Aug 27, 2019 at 1:47 PM Post #68 of 80
I want to buy one of the akg. I had the akg k7xx I really like it but sold it to upgrade to the akg k712. I didn’t buy the k712. Right know I like my dt880 and I want he widest soundstage possible under 350$. I dont like forward mids and to much bass fatigues me. I would like to buy the akg k701 but the price from us retailers is really expensive. I could get a k712 for the same price. So from what I have investigated.
K701 brighter with widest soundstage
K702 similar to 01 a little more present with a little reduce soundstage
Q701 more bass and warmer less soundstage of the first two
K7xx to much bass forward mids from what I remember smaller soundstage of the 4
K712 refined sound compare to k7xx. bass have more quality and is tight with better treble. Soundstage not as wide as k701 but more coherent and 3d
 
Last edited:
Sep 23, 2019 at 10:20 PM Post #69 of 80
In case you're wondering, if you put original K712 pads to K701 planning to get the fuller tonality of K712 along with the smoothest treble of K701, you end up with an unofficial K711 which sounds pretty much like K712.
That means, fuller/easier sound that's not as linear as K701 in the treble region.

That sounds like a nice combo. I can have 701 sound sig or 712 with simple switch of the pads. I like that idea, though I am a huge fan of Grado RS2e, so unsure adding an AKG would be a smart thing to do :)
 
Oct 1, 2019 at 6:09 AM Post #70 of 80
I want to buy one of the akg. I had the akg k7xx I really like it but sold it to upgrade to the akg k712. I didn’t buy the k712. Right know I like my dt880 and I want he widest soundstage possible under 350$. I dont like forward mids and to much bass fatigues me. I would like to buy the akg k701 but the price from us retailers is really expensive. I could get a k712 for the same price. So from what I have investigated.
K701 brighter with widest soundstage
K702 similar to 01 a little more present with a little reduce soundstage
Q701 more bass and warmer less soundstage of the first two
K7xx to much bass forward mids from what I remember smaller soundstage of the 4
K712 refined sound compare to k7xx. bass have more quality and is tight with better treble. Soundstage not as wide as k701 but more coherent and 3d

I too am in the same boat...
for me, its just a choice between the 702 vs 712(lack of replacement cables rules out the K701 for me). The K702 is about 120 EUR and the K712 is 199 EUR here in France. I will only be buying one AKG headphone in the near future and I already own the DT 990, HD 6XX, HD595 among open cans...
Any advice as to which one would be the better complementing headphone to the ones I already have ? I would say, its the soundstage that is missing from my existing list of cans..
Thanks in advance for your advice !
 
Nov 15, 2019 at 6:17 AM Post #72 of 80
Is k712 actually an upgrade over k7xx?
I got 2 pairs of K712 one was from April 2018 and the other one produced in July 2019 , and they sounded different , the one from early 2018 sound much closer to the Q701 i have
the 2019 version is brighter and have more bass and sound really close to the 7xx and they are almost identical in sound except that the 712 have more details, more depth in sound and touch larger sound stage , if budget is priority go for the 7xx , if you want the best by 20-40% go for late production K712
 
Nov 15, 2019 at 7:28 AM Post #74 of 80
Thanks GU1DO. I've read K712 had some upper mid peak at around 2khz and people were solving it with equalizer. Does 2019 production suffer from this problem?
no not at all , i dont need any EQ , to my ears it sound balanced
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top