Tribbs
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2011
- Posts
- 204
- Likes
- 33
Quote:
Unless you have a pair of infamous Golden Ears, I would say no.
Look, the OPA627 vintage was released in 1990. The design is over 22 years old!
For about $15 you can put together a pair of stellar LME49990MA (2011 vintage) opamps on a Brown Dog adapter.
(On the same page for $33 they will build it for you.)
"My top three devices for serious analog audio work are LME49990, OPA1611 and OPA211. LME49990 is the only one capable of true 24-bit analog performance when powered with +/- 15 V supply (S/N = 159 dB,THD = 146 dB). As the THD of LT1028 is 96 dB, it is "only" good for 16-bit systems. NE5534A is even less linear, THD = 93 dB." (see comments)
So there is no difference of my cheaper OPA627AU versus the OPA627AP and OPA637AP?
Also upgrading to the OPA627BP, would it be a significant difference that would be notice-able?
Unless you have a pair of infamous Golden Ears, I would say no.
Look, the OPA627 vintage was released in 1990. The design is over 22 years old!
For about $15 you can put together a pair of stellar LME49990MA (2011 vintage) opamps on a Brown Dog adapter.
(On the same page for $33 they will build it for you.)
"My top three devices for serious analog audio work are LME49990, OPA1611 and OPA211. LME49990 is the only one capable of true 24-bit analog performance when powered with +/- 15 V supply (S/N = 159 dB,THD = 146 dB). As the THD of LT1028 is 96 dB, it is "only" good for 16-bit systems. NE5534A is even less linear, THD = 93 dB." (see comments)