Let me ask you slater is there a difference in silver quality? I forgot someone told me that some cheaper quality silver is what is used on a lot of the aliexpress cables but. Heck if it sounds the same and looks the same well.
Take that free $500 silver cable they are throwing in for the new 64 audio hybrid earphone on the front page. $500? vs $15.99? I am sure there is more silver material on the $500 cable but is it just better silver? I don't get it either.
Well, all pure silver starts as 99.99% bullion. As long as it’s refined and assayed to 99.99% pure silver, it’s not like silver from India is “better“ than silver from Russia.
When it’s made into other “stuff”, it must be mixed with other metals depending on what properties are desired.
Just like 14k gold is only 58.5% pure gold, silver is the same way.
Alloys are mixed into the silver to make the insulated wiring (ie the single wire on a spool). The wiring can never be 99.99% pure silver, or else it will not be robust. It must have some other metals added (such as copper or brass) to make the wire resilient and be able to flex and bend and last as a cable.
Sterling silver is only 92.5% pure silver; the rest is made up of other metals. Silver (currency) coins are usually 90% silver. So for the TRN cables to be 95% pure silver is very good, and is a very high silver content for cable.
If a company wanted to save money, they could use less silver and more alloys. For example, 75% or 50% pure silver (and the rest alloys). But it really doesn’t save
that much money in the grand scheme. Maybe $1 worth of silver. If a company was really unscrupulous and wanted to cheat people they would just sell tin cables as pure silver (or silver plated copper cables as pure silver).
But the reality is $500 silver cables are a lot of markup IMO. Sure, they may have other features that justify some price premium, such as beryllium copper jacks, rhodium plating, hand braiding, cryo treating, solder quality, build quality, etc. But the actual silver contained in the individual wires is virtually identical. An exception would be a thicker gauge of wire. A silver cable that uses 20 gauge wire will be more expensive than an identical silver cable that uses 28 gauge wire, simply because it contains more precious metal.
But I’m sorry to bust anyone’s bubble, but a $500 IEM cable that uses (for example) 95% pure silver is really just a luxury/prestige markup mostly due to marketing or name, compared to a $50 IEM cable that also uses (for example) 95% pure silver with roughly the same construction and build quality.
Finally, I want to clarify the purity. TRN and others advertise that they use 99.99% pure silver. But the finished cable contains 95% silver. That’s not lying; the context of the marketing is just confusing. What they really are saying is that of the 95% silver that’s in the cable, the silver used is 99.99% pure silver. It’s like if I ordered a whiskey and soda water from a bar. The finished drink might contain 50% whiskey and 50% water, but the advertising on the water bottle says it’s 99.99% pure water. Yes, the water IS 99.99% pure water, but I mixed it with the whiskey to a 50% dilution. So there’s no trickery involved; it’s just a marketing mumbo jumbo that can be a bit confusing if taken out of context. Make sense?