audiocroissant
100+ Head-Fier
I own both LCDX 2021 and the latest Arya. They do not sound similar.
i meant that I sounds more like an Arya rather a 2020 version. Anyway, all great headphones and it’s all down to taste.I own both LCDX 2021 and the latest Arya. They do not sound similar.
Man... here's to hoping I can get a review unit soon. The good examples of the X in the past have been mind blowingly more detailed than the 2C or 2F already.My comped LCD-X came in (late August build). By the way some of you guys made it sound, I would've expected it to sound more like the GX, which is more dry, and less focused in the bass regions. I thought the GX was a vastly underrated LCD, but then I compared directly to the X, and there's a reason the X costs more. It's just absolutely infused with musicality and depth that the GX can't muster. They are in two different tiers. I still think the GX is great in a bubble, but man...the X is woah. I also wanna say I'm not an EQ guy, so my impression is as is.
I'm, also very surprised how LITTLE this thing needs to get to loud levels. I had it running on my Jotunheim 2 balanced on high gain, and I barely even got started on the volume knob. This is definitely a low gain only headphone, lol.
It is still 100% Audeze house sound, so I dunno where people it sounds like an Arya. I don't agree. They may cater to similar things, but this is still a very Audeze sounding headphone. The Arya doesn't sound like this. Now if I owned one or the other, I probably wouldn't get the other, but they're not so close to say they are close-close IMHO. The Arya is a stellar headphone. The X is a stellar headphone. Just saying they're not so similar that I'd call the X a HFM sounding headphone. I don't agree.
The true test is whether a dark/warmhead like me will give up the 2C for this. I LOVE the 2C. I haven't started that comparison. But the X is definitely immediately impressive.
(disclaimer: Yes I've recently been under the employ of Audeze, but I still maintain my individuality and have my preferences and tastes. My opinions above are 100% my own, and if you believe I made them just because I work for Audeze now, you're free to ignore, but I was a reviewer first, and stand by my words as how I truly feel, no bias. The only bias in my statement I have is for good stuff, and this stuff is GOOD).
They are great with these genres (and all genres) IF you EQ a bass shelf. Just a bass shelf, I do +6 db below 200hz. As much as I love the LCD-XC without this shelf, for me, they would be limited to rock, jazz, classical or similar.How well do the new XC's handle pop and EDM? it seems like they would be perfect, but I want some owner's opinions.
I would likely be putting a small bass shelf on them regardless. thank you for your help!They are great with these genres (and all genres) IF you EQ a bass shelf. Just a bass shelf, I do +6 db below 200hz. As much as I love the LCD-XC without this shelf, for me, they would be limited to rock, jazz, classical or similar.
I am using A90 and with balanced XLR I get more punch in bass and details retrieval than my Hugo 2.I still waiting my LCD XC, may i ask which amplifier good with LCD XC as below?
Topping A90
SMSL SP400
Singxer SA-1
the 21 LCD-X will wipe the floor with 2C’s blood. But 2F Is another story IMO. It’s not significantly more detailed than 2F IMHO. It’s definitely more resolving but I always find X (even the new one) to be more intimate and maybe that translates to have more observable detail. I also like how crazy 2F benefits from some serious Tube Amps while X kinda don’t care that much in that regard.Man... here's to hoping I can get a review unit soon. The good examples of the X in the past have been mind blowingly more detailed than the 2C or 2F already.