CoiL
Member of the Trade: Wood Audio Accessories & Modifications
Some time ago thought about it but then I jumped on KZ hype train... glad I did
Edit:
Btw, another thing I noticed about ANV... With lower quality and badly recorded music they easily bring out slight hiss.
It`s not noticeable while music is playing but on quiet places it can be heard sometimes.
And I do believe they benefit from amping in sub-bass department. Just tried them with DX50 high-gain (which I usually do not use because mid-gain is more dynamic)... and sub-bass is actually quite good. Here are some sub-bass test songs out many many I have in my EDM collection:
ANV does quite good with those songs actually but since its bass department is fast hitting, clear and accurate, I find it lack in sub-bass sustain/roll-off with this kind of music and prefer ED9/ATE for it (last song from 1:50 is good example for it).
Some high-tone sounds/instruments with this kind of music can also be littlebit "hurting" because ANV has different imaging/focus with highs than ATE/ED9. In case of some highs (depends on mastering) ANV "hits" them right into middle of headspace while ATE/ED9 keep them more away from headspace centre point (using same song for all three to evaluate).
Like I said, imo ANV is more suitable for acoustic/instrumental/vocals.
Hope this is useful for somebody making choice between ATE/ANV/ED9
Edit:
Btw, another thing I noticed about ANV... With lower quality and badly recorded music they easily bring out slight hiss.
It`s not noticeable while music is playing but on quiet places it can be heard sometimes.
And I do believe they benefit from amping in sub-bass department. Just tried them with DX50 high-gain (which I usually do not use because mid-gain is more dynamic)... and sub-bass is actually quite good. Here are some sub-bass test songs out many many I have in my EDM collection:
ANV does quite good with those songs actually but since its bass department is fast hitting, clear and accurate, I find it lack in sub-bass sustain/roll-off with this kind of music and prefer ED9/ATE for it (last song from 1:50 is good example for it).
Some high-tone sounds/instruments with this kind of music can also be littlebit "hurting" because ANV has different imaging/focus with highs than ATE/ED9. In case of some highs (depends on mastering) ANV "hits" them right into middle of headspace while ATE/ED9 keep them more away from headspace centre point (using same song for all three to evaluate).
Like I said, imo ANV is more suitable for acoustic/instrumental/vocals.
I honestly can`t rate one over another because they have different sound signature and music focus.
ATE is great all-rounder while ED9 is more suitable for EDM/pop-rock and ANV for acoustic/instrumental/vocal.
Hope this is useful for somebody making choice between ATE/ANV/ED9