Judge Buff
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2008
- Posts
- 913
- Likes
- 85
Quote:
Try to get that car in your ear and your analogy may make sense...
Originally Posted by odigg /img/forum/go_quote.gif The existence of burn-in is not answered by debate and subjective evaluations which can vary greatly by mood, environment, and group think. scott549 idea would be a sound test of burn-in and would demonstrate burn-in. I strongly support the idea of "brain-in" but have zero believe in burn-in, especially the way it's presented on Head-Fi. If nothing else at least demonstrate a change in FR or distortion greater than the changes variations typically seen from changes in head or in ear placement. Burn in for 100 hours? I don't believe it. Here's one reason for why. A brand new car needs, at most, 3000 miles of burn in for the engine. Given that people in the USA typically probably drive 30+ mph on average, even a car needs less than 100 hours of burn in. Somehow a tiny moving diaphragm needs more burn in then a car engine which has so many moving parts that regularly expand and contract? They also rub against bearings and metal surfaces with nothing more for lubricant than a tiny bit of oil. |
Try to get that car in your ear and your analogy may make sense...
