TopPop
Headphoneus Supremus
Anyone else notice that the cloth that covers the inside baffle is really loose? Or is it just my pair?
Originally Posted by jaudio /img/forum/go_quote.gif Same phones but for Asian market. JVC HPR-X900 has the old Rca symbol The dog(nipper) and the Victrola along with the model # looks better than the ha-rx900. A good picture at hardforum.com |
Originally Posted by Benaiir /img/forum/go_quote.gif I'm interested in down/upgrading (Not sure if it's which) from the AKG K99's. I think the JVC'd be more cost-effective. Can anyone PM me the wearability of them? (Comfort, weight while in use, length of use) |
Originally Posted by dclancy /img/forum/go_quote.gif Anyone disassemble one of these yet. Want to take a look inside but don't feel like breaking them in the first hour of playing with them. |
Originally Posted by dclancy /img/forum/go_quote.gif I bought the 700's for their lack (compared to the 900) of soundstage stage, but considering the only real dif between the cans seems to be a little extra venting in the cups for a semi open design, these could easily become $30 900's. I'd actually be more interested in bringing out the recessed mids and taming the bass a notch. |
Originally Posted by dclancy /img/forum/go_quote.gif ...the only real dif between the cans seems to be a little extra venting in the cups for a semi open design, these could easily become $30 900's. |
The lenses could be marketing puffery. Or they could provide a real acoustic benefit."Acoustic lenses (located in front of diaphragm) tune direct and indirect sound by subtly offsetting holes in each lens"
Originally Posted by micmacmo /img/forum/go_quote.gif Not sure about venting being the only difference. From the JVC catalog: The lenses could be marketing puffery. Or they could provide a real acoustic benefit. |
Originally Posted by jaudio /img/forum/go_quote.gif JVC harx700 - a poor mans ath-ad900!! - Page 18 - [H]ard|Forum Post 342 Pictures of the 700's but you get the idea. |