I guess the idea is that "audiophile" connotes more than "it just works". Sound quality should have some part of the assessment...That's correct. Why isn't it valid? It plays every format, it costs nothing. When I find something I'm satisfied with I usually don't spend any time looking for something else. And I don't care if I have credibility with you or anybody else. I'm not on your payroll. Understand this.
The thread is "Is there such a thing as an audiophile music player for windows" and I answered that. My answer was on topic.
Many other people said the same thing before I did. Why are you trying to gang-bang me? If you want to know you and you buddy could have asked "For the people who like foobar, do you think it's better than other players?" Or you could start a new thread. Because this thread is only about whether there is an audiophile player for Windows. Many of us responded to that with "foobar."
I don't understand the bellicose attitudes of some of the people here lately. Somebody asks a question, people answer, and then somebody doesn't like the answer. Nobody is paying us and it's free for everybody to participate. If you don't like my answer and the answer of the rest of the guys who said foobar, just ignore us. This could be a pleasant place with people expressing their opinions based on their experience. It doesn't have to degenerate into a needless of mindless arguments over nothing.
Really don't think I was bellicose at all, just trying to assess your answer in the scope of the OP's question. FWIW I just asked if you tried anything else. You started being bellicose by assuming I didn't have a point...