@davidmolliere Are you sure you like them? Take your time and consider it. In the circumstance that you don't, I'll take them off your hands free of charge. I'm generous like that, ya know?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Introducing CL2 Planar (Impressions Thread)
- Thread starter McCol
- Start date
-
- Tags
- cl2 cl2 planar rha
davidmolliere
Headphoneus Supremus
@waveSounds So generous of you... not only do I like them but I did have to go through delivery hassle so nobody touches them until the 21st of october french meetup (@lafeuill glad to see you there!)
I have quite a bit on my todo list with those :
Edit : Ordered Hansound Audio Zen 4 wire cable for the CL2, now the wait begins
I have quite a bit on my todo list with those :
- check the copper cable with AMP7, I suspect it will be beneficial and I am not a huge fan of SPC cables.
- check how it pairs with Mojo, I suspect this is going to be a real treat
- Go through a whole lot of musical genres, so far CL2 is just amazing with Jazz I suspect it's going to be just as good for classical and then I wouldn't be surprised if it's a great all rounder
Edit : Ordered Hansound Audio Zen 4 wire cable for the CL2, now the wait begins
Last edited:
NickyNose
Head-Fier
How's the soundstage relative to the iSines?
Just tried to compare them. As I said the test is difficult to conduct due to the different connections, and some unfair advantages IMO.
Ran both the CL2's and iSines out of a Sony NW-ZX300 on 3.5 mm jack. Clear winner is the CL2's. Bass is better, sub bass is lacking in both, overall, its not muddy or thick, just reduced. The CL2's have better instrument separation, and you can better fix instrument location. Without ever hearing them both pushed they would both be very good, but not really anything to write about. They both suffer from a lack of power, and suffer terribly.
I ran the CL2's out of the balanced output and they shine. everything just opened up, I had to reduce the volume some 20 levels. I had been using the volume near 90 of 120 on high gain for both IEMs, with the balanced I turned it down to around 65. I had the same or very near EQ settings on both devices (as close as I could using the Audeze app). When testing the iSines on my old iPhone with the lightning port and cypher cable they had slight edge on soundstage, but also do not seal well. They are almost an open back (sound does leak, both ways). I had a fan running and I could clearly hear it with the iSine's, not interference, just the blades moving the air. Volume was just past half, so they both got more power, and a well needed push. The winner here was not so clear IMO, but I prefer the CL2's, maybe because they are newer toy.
I have been collecting IEM's and headphones in general for a few years, and till now nothing has made me think of selling any of them. The CL2's have started a spark, maybe its the combination of the Sony, and CL2's.
The test was conducted using Jethro Tull's greatest hits, Bungle in the Jungle track, and Broadsword, on a loop.
Last edited:
NickyNose
Head-Fier
Hansound Audio Zen 4 wire cable for the CL2
Is that the pure silver cable?
kukkurovaca
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2017
- Posts
- 1,456
- Likes
- 985
Just tried to compare them. As I said the test is difficult to conduct due to the different connections, and some unfair advantages IMO.
Ran both the CL2's and iSines out of a Sony NW-ZX300 on 3.5 mm jack. Clear winner is the CL2's. Bass is better, sub bass is lacking in both, overall, its not muddy or thick, just reduced. The CL2's have better instrument separation, and you can better fix instrument location. Without ever hearing them both pushed they would both be very good, but not really anything to write about. They both suffer from a lack of power, and suffer terribly.
I ran the CL2's out of the balanced output and they shine. everything just opened up, I had to reduce the volume some 20 levels. I had been using the volume near 90 of 120 on high gain for both IEMs, with the balanced I turned it down to around 65. I had the same or very near EQ settings on both devices (as close as I could using the Audeze app). When testing the iSines on my old iPhone with the lightning port and cypher cable they had slight edge on soundstage, but also do not seal well. They are almost an open back (sound does leak, both ways). I had a fan running and I could clearly hear it with the iSine's, not interference, just the blades moving the air. Volume was just past half, so they both got more power, and a well needed push. The winner here was not so clear IMO, but I prefer the CL2's, maybe because they are newer toy.
I have been collecting IEM's and headphones in general for a few years, and till now nothing has made me think of selling any of them. The CL2's have started a spark, maybe its the combination of the Sony, and CL2's.
The test was conducted using Jethro Tull's greatest hits, Bungle in the Jungle track, and Broadsword, on a loop.
Nice, thanks! I like the iSine a lot (currently used mostly balanced with an ALO CDM), but the lack of isolation means they're only appropriate in some situations.
NickyNose
Head-Fier
Nice, thanks! I like the iSine a lot (currently used mostly balanced with an ALO CDM), but the lack of isolation means they're only appropriate in some situations.
I really like the iSines too, they were my favorite IEM, but the plastic ear hooks hurt my ears and the open concept as you said was not appropriate in all situations.
davidmolliere
Headphoneus Supremus
Is that the pure silver cable?
Nope, given the signature of the CL2 and my own preferences I went for a copper cable that brings body and warmth with emphasis on vocal presence and should smoothen the highs a tad (this is based on @flinkenick's review). I have a hunch it will be happily married to the CL2 for some reason
I already prefer the RHA copper cable even if it's not balanced, as I said SPC tend to artifically boost detail and for me, the CL2 doesn't need it. Given my own preferences I'll go toward a tad more warmth, body and texture rather than sharpness, air and energy up top. YMMV.
Last edited:
Kitechaser
Headphoneus Supremus
Are you using the klipsch oval tips?I really like the iSines too, they were my favorite IEM, but the plastic ear hooks hurt my ears and the open concept as you said was not appropriate in all situations.
Did they fit the CL2?
I need to find some comfortable tips.
Last edited:
NickyNose
Head-Fier
Are you using the klipsch oval tips?
Did they fit the CL2?
I need to find some comfortable tips.
Yes, to both. They took a little bit of work to get on as the hole is smaller, but they do fit on the CL2's
Kitechaser
Headphoneus Supremus
How's the bass response and trebble with the smaller bore. SoundstageYes, to both. They took a little bit of work to get on as the hole is smaller, but they do fit on the CL2's
NickyNose
Head-Fier
How's the bass response and trebble with the smaller bore. Soundstage
I think they are good, in all aspects of sound. the isolation is very good. I couldn't get a good fit with the RHA tips. The Klispch tips fit my ears, I have to dig them out, no slip
Kitechaser
Headphoneus Supremus
Cool thanks. And mediums run standard size?I think they are good, in all aspects of sound. the isolation is very good. I couldn't get a good fit with the RHA tips. The Klispch tips fit my ears, I have to dig them out, no slip
That is what I use.
I am gonna order some.
NickyNose
Head-Fier
I use the large, on both the RHA double flange, and the Klispch, both seemed best for me so if mediums from RHA worked for you I would stay with that size.Cool thanks. And mediums run standard size?
That is what I use.
I am gonna order some.
Kitechaser
Headphoneus Supremus
Sweet. Just ordered them. Hopefully they work for me.I use the large, on both the RHA double flange, and the Klispch, both seemed best for me so if mediums from RHA worked for you I would stay with that size.
Last edited:
Joseph Lin
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2016
- Posts
- 448
- Likes
- 245
Do you have other DAP or Amp to try? I am considering purchasing DX200/AMP8 to drive CL2. Carrying iDSD is too cumbersome.So first impressions with the CL2… out of DX200Ti / AMP8 balanced with Tennmaks one word : extended!
Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)