kuekwee
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 12, 2015
- Posts
- 32
- Likes
- 10
Hi, wanna ask anyone upgrade their stock USB cable? Which one is good?
Hi, wanna ask anyone upgrade their stock USB cable? Which one is good?
![]() |
![]() |
Stay updated on iFi audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi,
If you like, you can read up on the background on what is from our technical point of view, the characteristics a good-uqality USB audio cable should have. Once you have this in mind, then you can sift through the different USB cables out there.
This is for the USB2.0 type but applies to USB2.0 and USB3.0 cables.
http://ifi-audio.com/wp-content/uploads/data/GeminiUSBCable.pdf
Cheer
Hi,
If you like, you can read up on the background on what is from our technical point of view, the characteristics a good-uqality USB audio cable should have. Once you have this in mind, then you can sift through the different USB cables out there.
This is for the USB2.0 type but applies to USB2.0 and USB3.0 cables.
http://ifi-audio.com/wp-content/uploads/data/GeminiUSBCable.pdf
Cheers.
Ifi don't have Male A to Female A USB cable?
I have a DX90, is Coax the best way to connect to this?
Coax is the only way for a DX90 to connect digitally to the micro iDSD, unless of course you want to feed DX90's line-out to micro iDSD and use it purely as amp.
Coax is the only way for a DX90 to connect digitally to the micro iDSD, unless of course you want to feed DX90's line-out to micro iDSD and use it purely as amp.
Good to know, thanks.
Have you ever compared this to the Mojo? This seems like it would be more bang for the buck.
It is. I do own both micro iDSD and Mojo. Both are great DAC/amp on its own right. Mojo is by far one of the best sounding DAC/amp of its size that I have ever listened to, and micro iDSD is nothing less in comparison on SQ, but offer a bit more features and versatility, plus a cheaper price tag. Those aside however, I think it is more down to personal preference on which one like better than any technical superiority.
I'd have to agree based on principal, as I have not heard the MOJO yet. But against the Full grown HUGO, my iDSD held its own. Liked it say, almost 90% as much as HUGO. MUCH less money.
It is. I do own both micro iDSD and Mojo. Both are great DAC/amp on its own right. Mojo is by far one of the best sounding DAC/amp of its size that I have ever listened to, and micro iDSD is nothing less in comparison on SQ, but offer a bit more features and versatility, plus a cheaper price tag. Those aside however, I think it is more down to personal preference on which one like better than any technical superiority.
It is. I do own both micro iDSD and Mojo. Both are great DAC/amp on its own right. Mojo is by far one of the best sounding DAC/amp of its size that I have ever listened to, and micro iDSD is nothing less in comparison on SQ, but offer a bit more features and versatility, plus a cheaper price tag. Those aside however, I think it is more down to personal preference on which one like better than any technical superiority.
Over the years I have always trusted your reviews and replies, this just seems like it would make more sense to own long term.
Mojo is a bit more refined but I'm sticking with iDSD for it versatility and ease of use. I just can't get use to using buttons for volume control.
I'd have to agree based on principal, as I have not heard the MOJO yet. But against the Full grown HUGO, my iDSD held its own. Liked it say, almost 90% as much as HUGO. MUCH less money.
That's good to hear. I read your review and you pair the DX90 with the DSD, are you still? Is there a difference now that you have it longer since your review? Nothing against the Mojo as I loved that thing, (I had it for 10 days) but there seems to be some issues arising here and there and the DSD seems to be built like a tank. The Mojo seems pretty rugged minus the balls, Im not sure how they are going to hold after months or years of use.