What are the dimensions? Myst have missed something as i dont see it being too big for a flagship atleast in pictures.The device is a little too big to my taste but we don't even know what DAC chip being used? The video says something about FPGA. Anymore details on inside?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
iBasso DX300 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 Octa-core 6GB RAM ******NEW Firmware 2.00 Android 11******
- Thread starter Paul - iBasso
- Start date
davidmolliere
Headphoneus Supremus
What are the dimensions? Myst have missed something as i dont see it being too big for a flagship atleast in pictures.
It's slim but the screen is 6.5 inches so it's bound to be as big as something like my iphone 12 pro Max
Yeh 6.5 inch is significant. But as long as its slim we shoups not need to replace jeans more often than usual thinkness is one thing that usually bothers me more.It's slim but the screen is 6.5 inches so it's bound to be as big as something like my iphone 12 pro Max
yannis
100+ Head-Fier
DAC - CS43198
Quad DAC Chips Array
Careful users must have found - a in the FPGA introduction diagram , we
Four DACs are marked. Yes, the DX300 uses 4 Cirrus Logic
Flag ship decoding chip -- CS43198 QFN version of the group point DAC Matrix ,
A total of eight DAC channels, and after each independent 8 LPF
Double parallel to achieve fully balanced output . Multi-DAC parallel, can be effective
Reduced single DAC chip due to manufacturing process and environmental impact
Dispersion type distortion, and greatly improve the sound density and detail performance .
Quad DAC Chips Array
Careful users must have found - a in the FPGA introduction diagram , we
Four DACs are marked. Yes, the DX300 uses 4 Cirrus Logic
Flag ship decoding chip -- CS43198 QFN version of the group point DAC Matrix ,
A total of eight DAC channels, and after each independent 8 LPF
Double parallel to achieve fully balanced output . Multi-DAC parallel, can be effective
Reduced single DAC chip due to manufacturing process and environmental impact
Dispersion type distortion, and greatly improve the sound density and detail performance .
Attachments
yannis
100+ Head-Fier
[DX300 pre-sale Countdown 1 day]
December 25, 3: 00 pm grand pre-sale, pricing 7666 yuan = 1,173.88 USD
December 25, 3: 00 pm grand pre-sale, pricing 7666 yuan = 1,173.88 USD
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2013
- Posts
- 28,357
- Likes
- 32,208
Awesome pricing! OMG CL chips in flagship DAP! My dream comes true!!! I freaking love CL chips! This chip is so wonderful in dx160. To push it further is awesome![DX300 pre-sale Countdown 1 day]
December 25, 3: 00 pm grand pre-sale, pricing 7666 yuan = 1,173.88 USD
NOS filters! Does it utilize the CL 1x ? Or does it pass external DSP from FPGA ? What about MQA ?
Last edited:
Cirrus... hmm...
ehjie
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2009
- Posts
- 3,571
- Likes
- 6,501
(ctto Musin/ibasso)
Yup
many of us remember the ‘wolfson vs cirrus’ wars on head-fi
buuut...
https://www.forbes.com/sites/sharif...-to-wolfson-microelectronics/?sh=26869cf75e67
Kind of absorbed a bit of each others good points over the years...
I did enjoy the DX160 (cirrus) sound over the DX150 (AKM)
many of us remember the ‘wolfson vs cirrus’ wars on head-fi
buuut...
https://www.forbes.com/sites/sharif...-to-wolfson-microelectronics/?sh=26869cf75e67
Kind of absorbed a bit of each others good points over the years...
I did enjoy the DX160 (cirrus) sound over the DX150 (AKM)
Last edited:
gerelmx1986
Headphoneus Supremus
Cirrus logic = iPod = bad sound quality
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2013
- Posts
- 28,357
- Likes
- 32,208
Dude! Lately you don’t sound like yourself. Is everything ok with you over there ? This CL chips were excellent on dx160, and dx160 could give many players a run for it money. But it was only being implemented in a mid tier engineering level. Have you tried this particular DAC-IC in a properly done Player ?Cirrus logic = iPod = bad sound quality
Yes, I loved dx160, and always tried to imagine what it could have done in a flagship level , now it really is in a flagship level, 4x of them, and with independent Power Rails, together with removable amp Modules!! With MangoOS....OMG, and FPGA!Yup
many of us remember the ‘wolfson vs cirrus’ wars on head-fi
buuut...
https://www.forbes.com/sites/sharif...-to-wolfson-microelectronics/?sh=26869cf75e67
Kind of absorbed a bit of each others good points over the years...
I did enjoy the DX160 (cirrus) sound over the DX150 (AKM)
Last edited:
gerelmx1986
Headphoneus Supremus
Well I've read cirrus is mostly used in mid to low end daps and with the iPod it had a blt of bad rep. I am skeptical that I can deliver a wow factor. In fact my first Walkman NW-E507 used a cirrus (2005) i sounded good in its time but compare to my WM1A today it sounds rather lifeless unengagingDude! Lately you don’t sound like yourself. Is everything ok with you over there ? This CL chips were excellent on dx160, and dx160 could give many players a run for it money. But it was only being implemented in a mid tier engineering level. Have you tried this particular DAC-IC in a properly done Player ?
Yes, I loved dx160, and always tried to imagine what it could have done in a flagship level , now it really is in a flagship level, 4x of them, and with independent Power Rails, together with removable amp Modules!! With MangoOS....OMG, and FPGA!
Cirrus... hmm...
going to pull the trigger ?
Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 10 (members: 0, guests: 10)