- Joined
- Oct 6, 2013
- Posts
- 15,567
- Likes
- 50,097
Here is my 2c to add to DAC discussion. 4-5 years ago there were clear lines separating entry level, mid-fi, and summit-fi DAPs, based on design and performance around specific DAC model. As a matter of fact, similar to IEM driver wars (more is better), we went through a cycle of some manufacturers focusing on DAC model to distinguish their flagships. AK4490 was at the top, then they had to switch to AK4493 which soon got replaced by AK4497 until it was a must to have AK4499 to consider yourself a true flagship. Other manufacturers put marketing aside and focused on implementation including the most important part of the sound shaping in the DAP - the amplifier stage design. Take a look at DX200, DX220, and DX220 MAX, spanning over almost 4 years and using the same ES9028Pro, that part of the design didn't change while the sound performance went up from one release to the other. Or another great example is Dethonray DTR1 with its AK4490 implementation that sounds better than some other DAPs with 4497/4499.
My point, lines are blurred now (and I love that video ) between tiers of the DAPs where components used in so called "entry" level might be still of a higher end flagship status, but other aspects of the design and features are scaled down to distinguish between entry/mid-fi/flagship. Due to AKM factory fire, using AK DACs now is not the best idea, and it sounds like iBasso decided to take a break from ES DACs and focus more on CS43198 implemented in DX160. As many others already said, from an audio performance perspective, DX160 punches above and beyond its price point. But we have no idea how it will sound and be implemented in DX300. Personally, I don't even want to speculate until I hear it because it makes no sense to draw a conclusion about DX300 sound based on DX160 reference. At this point, DAC name and model is just a paper spec, so let's see how it will be implemented in the design because based on the last 4-5 years of watching and testing iBasso DAPs I noticed they are not into marketing hype of the DAC model and instead focusing more on implementation and amplifier design.
My point, lines are blurred now (and I love that video ) between tiers of the DAPs where components used in so called "entry" level might be still of a higher end flagship status, but other aspects of the design and features are scaled down to distinguish between entry/mid-fi/flagship. Due to AKM factory fire, using AK DACs now is not the best idea, and it sounds like iBasso decided to take a break from ES DACs and focus more on CS43198 implemented in DX160. As many others already said, from an audio performance perspective, DX160 punches above and beyond its price point. But we have no idea how it will sound and be implemented in DX300. Personally, I don't even want to speculate until I hear it because it makes no sense to draw a conclusion about DX300 sound based on DX160 reference. At this point, DAC name and model is just a paper spec, so let's see how it will be implemented in the design because based on the last 4-5 years of watching and testing iBasso DAPs I noticed they are not into marketing hype of the DAC model and instead focusing more on implementation and amplifier design.