I didn’t see those posts. Could you point me to one of them? I have mostly seen high praise, and it could be interesting to know different opinions.
In my system and to my ears the differences are subtle. Still waiting to experience this transformational change that several members have reported. At first listen I attributed the great analogue sound in my system to the M Scaler, but by switching back and forth between pass through (red) and full upscale (white), I came to the conclusion that Dave is an absolutely amazing DAC, and the full upscaled HMS only made a subtle difference. This was of course disappointing , because 1)I had really high expectations, and 2) I bought two (for two setups).
My preliminary conclusion is that HMS may not be targeted people like me with less than perfect ears. Many years with a violin under my chin and years of playing in a symphony orchestra may not have done any good to my hearing either. However, what I believe to hearHi Danish71,
ith the full upscaling HMS is a more open and free sound. It may be called a bigger soundstage in audiophile terms.
It is also possible that I need more time to appreciate the improvements that the HMS brings, so time will tell.
I must stress that I do believe what people report about their experiences with great improvements, so I have no desire to dispute any of those positive findings that have been expressed already! But people’s ability to hear small audible variations differ a lot, as expressed by Rob Watts already, and I may be one audiophile with less sensitive and untrained ears.
On a side note, one thing that I would like to find out is, if Dave sounds different without the HMS in the path vs HMS in pass through mode. I have a suspicion that there is a difference. Just need some time to test it..