How to equalize your headphones: A Tutorial
Jul 19, 2009 at 7:14 PM Post #331 of 1,153
Quote:

Originally Posted by decay /img/forum/go_quote.gif
The EQ I recommend is IIEQPro by DDMF (**** DDMF-The home of Equalizers-DDMF ****)


sounds great!
happy_face1.gif
 
Jul 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM Post #332 of 1,153
@leeperry / 12Bass: right, but when I listen to music I don't tamper with the eq or skip around.. I just listen!
biggrin.gif
 
Jul 24, 2009 at 11:16 AM Post #333 of 1,153
thanks to OP for this very helpful thread. music sounds more natural now and i can listen at higher volumes. my headphones had very big emphasis around 2.3 kHz, which was very fatiguing. all gone now
k701smile.gif
peaks in 5-8 kHz range were relatively small in my case, the biggest one at 5 kHz.
 
Jul 24, 2009 at 4:40 PM Post #334 of 1,153
err im having a lot of trouble with this. i bought the IIEQPro vst to use with foobar2000 and i'm playing the pink noise while i'm adjusting the eq for my peaks, but i don't hear any change at all no matter how i change the eq. it's like its not even enabled but i don't really see how it isn't

edit:solved, my vst wrapper wasn't enabled under playback whoops
 
Jul 24, 2009 at 6:01 PM Post #335 of 1,153
Yay, another Portlander
smily_headphones1.gif


I just got a pair of HD 515s; going to try this out. I'm curious, though, if equalizing really is better than just burning-in with a specific set of music? Say, if you only listen to doom metal and all you play is doom metal, wouldn't the 'phone eventually be "equalized" for playing bassy music with somewhat muddy highs?

Please forgive my ignorance.
 
Jul 24, 2009 at 7:44 PM Post #336 of 1,153
Quote:

Originally Posted by Romanian /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Yay, another Portlander
smily_headphones1.gif


I just got a pair of HD 515s; going to try this out. I'm curious, though, if equalizing really is better than just burning-in with a specific set of music? Say, if you only listen to doom metal and all you play is doom metal, wouldn't the 'phone eventually be "equalized" for playing bassy music with somewhat muddy highs?

Please forgive my ignorance.



No. Sorry its not that easy. Would be nice though.
 
Jul 28, 2009 at 4:58 PM Post #337 of 1,153
This is great. I just got my Grado SR60i's and there is a nasty peak at around 2.2KHz. I lowered it by 9dB and tried out a song, and it's much more pleasurable to listen to.

edit: how do you change the peak type?
 
Aug 6, 2009 at 3:14 AM Post #340 of 1,153
hey guys, i have a issue maybe you can shed some light on. so i went through this guide maybe two weeks ago and equalized my headphones. then just yesterday i realized i have a decibel reading and that maybe using that i'd get a more precise reading on where my peaks were. doing it by ear i struggled to know for sure if it was actually louder or if the higher pitch just made it seem louder. so i was using it, and from the bottom to about 1khz, i was getting about an even reading and then the higher the frequency the higher the decibels till it dropped off after 20khz. now im a newb to this and audio in general, so maybe theres a technical explanation for it, but it seems that this method of equalizing is flawed if the higher the frequency the louder the sound because it would never peak and then drop off so it would seem like there are no peaks, just an incline
 
Aug 7, 2009 at 5:48 AM Post #341 of 1,153
Nice guide! I just did a quick equalization (less than 30 minutes) with my JVC HA-RX700, and I could definitely tell the difference. It definitely needed to be tweaked, as some parts of the music were definitely a tad too muted, but was overall a nice improvement.

I know you said to not switch back and forth from non-equalized to equalized, but I couldn't help myself. I could still tell an improvement. Just a few peaks made the music a bit too harsh, and this seemed to really smooth things out.

I'll definitely tweak things more eventually. I may even do this with my stereo setup!
 
Aug 8, 2009 at 9:35 PM Post #342 of 1,153
I'm building confidence to have a go. Any tips on how to transpose the EQing into iTunes?
I mean, I suppose I'll get into some "results" using the recommended SW on the 1st post, but iTunes equalizer is a bit limited in comparison...
 
Aug 21, 2009 at 10:18 AM Post #344 of 1,153
some food for thoughts:
Quote:

The necessity of headphone equalization

Some of the examples of music and speech on this web page can be played through high quality monitor loudspeakers, placed close to the listener. Localization and intelligibility can be accurately determined by this method if the loudspeakers preserve the relative loudness of low and high frequencies. Unfortunately, the examples that involve spaciousness or envelopment require headphones for accurate reproduction.

One of the most common problems of acoustic spaces is lack of clarity, muddiness, or poor intelligibility. These perceptions depend strongly on the balance between the low and the high frequencies. For reasons that are beyond the scope of this note, most headphones severely emphasize high frequencies. This includes the most highly touted and expensive models. The extra high frequency emphasis may increase sales of the product, but it gives a false impression of acoustic sound quality by increasing both clarity and intelligibility.

To accurately play the examples here a headphone equalizer needs to be used. There are many programs on the market for playing sound files that include a graphic equalizer, such as Sony “Sonic Stage” or many versions of Winamp. The graphic equalizer can be used to flatten the headphone response – if the response of the headphone when attached to a particular listener can be determined. Alas, the coupling of high frequencies to the eardrum varies greatly among individuals. It is influenced by the volume of the concha, the diameter and geometry of the ear canal, the eardrum impedance and other factors. Lacking probe microphone measurements at the eardrum, the best way to equalize a headphone is by listening.

The process of equalizing a headphone requires some patience, and perhaps some practice. When I first wrote this note I was hoping that by equalizing headphones so that all frequencies had similar loudness would be sufficient to match phones to different listeners. Recent experiments have shown that this is NOT the case.

It turns out that if you ask a subject to adjust a loudspeaker so that all frequencies have equal loudness different subjects come up with quite different equalization curves. And these curves are repeatable. What we need to do is match the loudness curve for a reference loudspeaker to the loudness curve we get from a particular headphone. When the headphone curve matches the loudspeaker curve, the headphone equalization is correct. – and my binaural examples can be heard as intended. I have written a Windows program that makes this process easy – and provides a dual 27 band graphic to actually do the needed correction. This program may eventually become a plug-in, or be offered here.

In the mean time, a patient listener can perhaps make use of the following files. Use a sound card with an equalizer as explained below to find a useable equalization for a high quality monitor loudspeaker, placed in front of a listener in the near field. Then do the same for a high quality headphone. Now subtract the equalization for the loudspeaker from the equalization obtained for the headphone, and set your equalizer for the difference. The headphone should now have the same timbre and frequency balance as the loudspeaker. This is what you want.

I have included sound files on this site that alternate a noise band at 1kHz with noise bands at other frequencies. There are three files. The one with 1k, 5k, and 3k works at high frequencies with a simple equalizer such as Winamp. There are two files with frequencies in octave bands. These might be more appropriate for Sonic Stage, or any of the Creative Labs products. All files are in .mp3 form. Early versions of Winamp had a bug which made the sliders work incorrectly when playing .mp3. Winamp Version 5.32 appears to be OK.

http://www.davidgriesinger.com/1k_5k_3k.mp3
http://www.davidgriesinger.com/1k_2k_4k_8k.mp3
http://www.davidgriesinger.com/1k_500_250_125.mp3

Download the files, and play them one at a time as a continuous loop, using your favorite sound player. Adjust the filters until all signals are perceived with equal loudness. You might be surprised at the amount of adjustment that is typically needed! Do this for your loudspeaker with the flattest on-axis response first, then for your headphone. Subtract the curves, set the equalizer to the difference, and see how it sounds.

You then need to load the sound examples from the papers into the same player to take advantage of the equalization. This is painful but necessary.

www.davidgriesinger.com


 
Aug 21, 2009 at 2:21 PM Post #345 of 1,153
BTW, I very much enjoy apEQ, it just sounds very good, not muffled or anything...Electri-Q never managed to do that for me
redface.gif




I'm still undecided on oversampling, I don't believe in upsampling to improve SQ...but maybe it's actually useful for EQ'ing...and oversampling/upsampling are 2 different things..
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top