jarthel
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2001
- Posts
- 784
- Likes
- 10
what's the alternative to a hole puncher? thank you
Originally Posted by jarthel /img/forum/go_quote.gif what's the alternative to a hole puncher? thank you |
Originally Posted by happyxix /img/forum/go_quote.gif So why is this mod supposed to "work"? Any scientific evidence to show why adding stuff in the headphones that seemly doesn't do anything works? |
Originally Posted by les_garten /img/forum/go_quote.gif Not a big reader are ya? |
Originally Posted by jarthel /img/forum/go_quote.gif what's the alternative to a hole puncher? thank you |
Stay updated on Moon Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
Originally Posted by musicman59 /img/forum/go_quote.gif What matters the most technical data in a graph or the listening experience? Looking at charted data in a graph does not give me any listening pleasure. Experiment, trust your ears and enjoy the ride through your music. I don't think this hobby can be totally technical. Everybody hear different and the way we hear and percive the sound can change by many factors from physical to emotional so why get hang up in pure technical data? IMO at the end what matter is if you like and enjoy what you hear regardless of what any chart says. |
Originally Posted by happyxix /img/forum/go_quote.gif I did. Somethings seem to be pull straight out of the audiophile gullible arse. Like gold and silver tips. Or...harmonic rocks. BUT PHYSICAL proof. Like maybe with a FQ graph or something to see what actually changed. I can shove rocks in my headphones and say it changed so and so too. |
Originally Posted by happyxix /img/forum/go_quote.gif True but I like to know the scientific details. I know the brain can be the altered to think one way way to easily. I want to know to see that this isn't some sort of lame sham that manifests in our minds like placebo. Want to see physical data. Its one of the faults of being an engineering student. "Why" is a question that can't always be answered =[ |
Originally Posted by les_garten /img/forum/go_quote.gif What you hear cannot always be demonstrated with a graph. There is no snake oil here, with the exception of the Cable, IMHO. The Dynamat Mods are pretty much based in sound engineering concepts of resonance control and abatement, and resonance/frequency tuning. We use an EEG to analyze the brain and it doesn't tell us anything about what is really going on in there, BUT, it's one of the few tools we have. We just don't have the tools to demonstrate why one amp sounds magical and one sounds, Meh. |
Originally Posted by Necrolic /img/forum/go_quote.gif Graphs mean almost nothing as far as the listening experience goes. You can look at scientific data all you want, but it's not going to tell you how something sounds in the end. For example, two headphones could have identical graphs, but one could sound very musical and warm while the other is dry and analytical. Dynamat doesn't do "nothing" by the way. |
Originally Posted by atothex /img/forum/go_quote.gif Who needs "science" to prove that stuffing pads moves the drivers away from your ears and makes them sound different? Try pulling your own phones off your ears or even moving them around a bit. Try changing pad materials. Try stuffing a dirty tshirt in there. Does it make a difference? If you need graphs to convince you of that stuff, then you're an idiot. |
Originally Posted by atothex /img/forum/go_quote.gif You clearly don't know much if you think frequency response graphs are objective and "don't lie." |