of course their is proof.ieee754 said:.
Any proof for that? I don't think that single atom could have enough energy to move a hair cell, even though they are very small.
It is in textbooks.
U find it
of course their is proof.ieee754 said:.
Any proof for that? I don't think that single atom could have enough energy to move a hair cell, even though they are very small.
I gave in to the sound of the Rev.2, just put the Rev.1 in return mail to Summer at Hifiman, Newark, DE. I will be getting the HE400i with the $100 credit towards the purchase when they are released. In the mean time I am enjoying listening to the most analytical sounding Hifiman yet! Clarity and air!
In the mean time I am enjoying listening to the most analytical sounding Hifiman yet! Clarity and air!
In the mean time I am enjoying listening to the most analytical sounding Hifiman yet! Clarity and air!
Is HE-560 rev.2 more analytical than HE-6?
of course their is proof.
It is in textbooks.
U find it
So I just got an update on the free shipping issue.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:20 PM, <jayazn5@netscape.net> wrote:
Thanks so much for the update! I have one question though. I was on Headfi yesterday and a few of other pre-order recipients were reporting that they are getting free shipping to send back the pre-order HE-560's and a $100 credit at Head direct. Is this promotion only for select Headfi members?
Response:
Hi ________,
I have just checked with my manager. Usually the owners of the pre-order HE-560 have to pay for the shipping fee when they send the old HE-560 back to us. As for the $100 credit at Head direct, yes you have that credit too. Next time when you want to purchase other products of our products, you can use that credit. If you have any other questions, please feel free to contact us.
Best Regards,
Lu Xiaofeng
HIFIMAN Customer Service Team
I guess some get free shipping while everyone gets the free $100 credit?
Am I being petty when I say, it's totally lame that people who ordered a headphone they assumed (and rightly, I'd say) would be the final product - one for which they paid shipping - which was then recalled by the manufacturer in exchange for the "final" version, are asked to return - at the consumer's cost - the headphone the manufacturer admits is not what they want you to have/less than perfect/not the final version?
I don't think so.
Am I being petty when I say, it's totally lame that people who ordered a headphone they assumed (and rightly, I'd say) would be the final product - one for which they paid shipping - which was then recalled by the manufacturer in exchange for the "final" version, are asked to return - at the consumer's cost - the headphone the manufacturer admits is not what they want you to have/less than perfect/not the final version?
I don't think so.
Did anyone actually receive a pre-paid return label for the pre-production HE-560s?
Typically, when you make a claim, it's considered bad form to insist the other party locate the proof.....