nwguy
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2012
- Posts
- 26
- Likes
- 47
Yep, that pic just looks like the old teak cups
Would be nice to know how these synergize with the Asgard 2, the only amp I own at the moment.
Yep, that pic just looks like the old teak cups
terja,
I still believe its the old pic, theres a smooth side where there would be a veneer--> plastic boundary, and the connector area doesn't have that extra bit of plastic (I can be wrong too, I'm just hoping not to stir up any more hope for a teak veneer). Hopefully impressions from the show come in to clarify (or Hifiman directly)
terja,
I still believe its the old pic, theres a smooth side where there would be a veneer--> plastic boundary, and the connector area doesn't have that extra bit of plastic (I can be wrong too, I'm just hoping not to stir up any more hope for a teak veneer). Hopefully impressions from the show come in to clarify (or Hifiman directly)
A fellow Head-Fi'er, @gnarlsagan, is at the THE show in Newport today. I tend to trust his ears more than just about anyone else's here at Head-Fi.. his reference headphones is the ER4S. I asked him to check out the HFM booth and give me his thoughts on the HE-560 & HE-400i.. here's what he had to say:
I found the 560 to be a lot more linear and clearer than the 400. The 400 has more mid-bass and less sub-bass to my ears, and the mids in general don't sound as forward and detailed. The 560 might have just a bit more of a treble peak around 9-10k, but nothing that's a problem imo at normal listening volumes. And I hate treble peaks!
A/Bing with the LCD3 shows the 560 to be clearer with less mid-bass and more totally accurate mids. Travel is a bit sharper, but the LCD3 is definitely a bit smoother over in the highs.
I think I might actually prefer the 560 over the SR007. I'm ABing those two actually with the SR009 as I write this. The SR007 sounds wrong somehow in comparison. Like less forward mids, and slightly more tizzy I the highs. The SR009 is the best headphone I've ever heard however. I've heard them before, but this clinches it. Impossibly clear and totally accurate.
I think the only thing maybe missing from the 560 is a tiny bit of 5-6k emphasis. The FR is balanced very well throughout the spectrum. I'm surprised by how much I like it tbh.
I asked about how he gauges the HE-560 & HE-400i's soundstage depth (which I find most orthos to lack).. he added more thoughts:
That's a pretty encouraging statement.