[Marleybob217]

No heat, don't worry.
 
But you are only using the headphone out from that receiver right? Aren't you wasting money this way? I did see they arent that much more expensive.
 
If it works, and sounds better than the E9 (exactly what didn't you like about it, I'm planning to use it too ) and isn't insanely expensive.
 
Why not?
 

 

[MattTCG]

Lots of people have had good results with receivers and orthos. Typically it's the older receivers. If it sound good to you, then you've found the right amp!!

 

[oyster]

Quote:

 
I  would put them on the front, facing the grill. Works for me!
 
 
Velours, grill mod, etc. If nothing works, maybe the mids just don't cut it for you. 
 
Where are you bumping them with EQ though?

Yeah, using with velours. Removed the grills for a while & was greeted with a very open , free flowing sound. With the grills on there is some sort of echo.
Did the eq bump at 3.5, 5 & 7 KHZ in foobar. Surprisingly it does very little effect on the vocals. It feels as if the upper treble is more affected rather than the vocals with eq bump. 
On many tracks i have felt that the HE400 is missing some mid frequencies completely or that its too muted too be listenable. 
The FR graph does suggest so, but i also feel that the driver just does not have enough quality to do vocals justice

 

[finrod]

Quote:

No heat, don't worry.
 
But you are only using the headphone out from that receiver right? Aren't you wasting money this way? I did see they arent that much more expensive.
 
If it works, and sounds better than the E9 (exactly what didn't you like about it, I'm planning to use it too ) and isn't insanely expensive.
 
Why not?
 

Well.... about wasting money.... I got them from the egg for $200 (right now they are for $250 but $50 off deal always pops up somewhere). That's cheaper than Objective DAC/O2 combo and you get so many different input options. I also liked the 192/24 dacs (1 dac per channel) on this AVR. Completely neutral/transparent and good resolution.
 
About E9.... well... this may just be me but I didn't find bass response to be that solid and clean. Also the portion of the highs was little toned down. It might be a good thing for HE400 but I didn't like the sound. My observations of E9 might be a little off as I haven't heard a lot of different amps but I know a little something about live music and all....
 
Quote:

Lots of people have had good results with receivers and orthos. Typically it's the older receivers. If it sound good to you, then you've found the right amp!!

I thought about buying some older ones. But then again thought about all the digital input capability of these newer ones and made the decision. Also the older ones would need separate (and hopefully good) DAC which translates to more money and I was just looking for spending minimum here.
 
Btw, I tried to go up to -5dB but couldn't stay there for more than a couple of seconds. But even then, the sound was perfect. No distortion or anything. Still clear separation, huge clean bass and everything.

 

[MrMateoHead]

Well I used the Fiio E9 to power it, but I tried my old traktor audio 2 dac, which could drive it very loud. But it would sound like absolute crap It was as if I could hear all the peaks in the music, but everything else was either inaudible(so very little detail) and the bass was very loose sounding. 

I don't know why I thought bass needs more power than other octaves. I thought I saw some graph somewhere that implicated that. I must have misunderstood.

I never knew the HE-400 actually needs more power than the HD650, I always thought the HE-400s were quite easy to drive. Apparantly they are only easy to drive relative to other planar magnetics?

Anyway The E9 will provide enough power to drive them. But I still don't understand why there is so much information lost even when the spl is loud enough. This must have something to do with the amount of volt/ampere the amp delivers. It must! Let's ask Tyll.

Thanks for your wise words

The HE-400 are most definitely easier to drive than other planars. If Hifiman improves the efficiency (and sound!) much further, I may never go back to dynamic. But needing 3x the power of an HD 650? That's a heckuva gap when considering High Dynamic Range recordings and the like, where you might easily need a full watt to accomplish what the dynamic drivers can do with a fraction of one.

I don't know about the traktor Audio 2 DAC, but I would suspect that what you were hearing wasn't so much a lack of power as the impact of very high output impedance on low input impedance. I cannot explain this like an expert, but the end result is that you screw up the dampening factor, which can screw up the sound if it is too low. 100 ohms out, for example, is great to keep distortion low feeding in to an amp, but the "rule of 8" would say that it couldn't drive a headphone well unless its impedance was about 800 Ohms. What you were hearing is what happens when dampening is screwed up by a combination of high output impedance and low input impedance.

The E9 is a great amp, but the output impedance is 10 Ohms, making it ideal for headphones rated @ 80 Ohms on up. If it sounds good to you, and the bass isn't "loose", I wouldn't worry. But, ideally, an amp that has an output impedance no greater than, say, 4 Ohms is going to work better with most typical headphones.

 

[preproman]

Quote:

But needing 3x the power of an HD 650?

 
 
What - the HE400 does?  No way...

 

[Marleybob217]

Quote:

The HE-400 are most definitely easier to drive than other planars. If Hifiman improves the efficiency (and sound!) much further, I may never go back to dynamic. But needing 3x the power of an HD 650? That's a heckuva gap when considering High Dynamic Range recordings and the like, where you might easily need a full watt to accomplish what the dynamic drivers can do with a fraction of one.
I don't know about the traktor Audio 2 DAC, but I would suspect that what you were hearing wasn't so much a lack of power as the impact of very high output impedance on low input impedance. I cannot explain this like an expert, but the end result is that you screw up the dampening factor, which can screw up the sound if it is too low. 100 ohms out, for example, is great to keep distortion low feeding in to an amp, but the "rule of 8" would say that it couldn't drive a headphone well unless its impedance was about 800 Ohms. What you were hearing is what happens when dampening is screwed up by a combination of high output impedance and low input impedance.
The E9 is a great amp, but the output impedance is 10 Ohms, making it ideal for headphones rated @ 80 Ohms on up. If it sounds good to you, and the bass isn't "loose", I wouldn't worry. But, ideally, an amp that has an output impedance no greater than, say, 4 Ohms is going to work better with most typical headphones.

Thanks for the advice! I noticed the O2 amp has an output impedance of 0.5, so this should, atleast in theory, sound quite a bit better with the HE-400 than the E9.
Then again, My gmp 8.35D has an impedance of 35 ohm, but it sounds really nice through the E9.
 
If I understand you correctly, than something with a high output impedance like the traktor audio 2 (100 ohm indeed) should sound worse with headphone that have low impedance. 
However this dac is meant for typical DJ headphones that have a relatively low impedance. And the traktor audio 2 did sound much better with low impedance headphones than the HD650.
So it can't be just the rule of 8 applying negatively.

 

[bcpk]

I use an old kenwood integrated speaker amplifier's HPO for my HE400s, no complaints here (except that I can only use about 10% of the volume knob because it's so powerful ).

 

[chewy4]

Quote:

Thanks for the advice! I noticed the O2 amp has an output impedance of 0.5, so this should, atleast in theory, sound quite a bit better with the HE-400 than the E9.
Then again, My gmp 8.35D has an impedance of 35 ohm, but it sounds really nice through the E9.
 
If I understand you correctly, than something with a high output impedance like the traktor audio 2 (100 ohm indeed) should sound worse with headphone that have low impedance. 
However this dac is meant for typical DJ headphones that have a relatively low impedance. And the traktor audio 2 did sound much better with low impedance headphones than the HD650.
So it can't be just the rule of 8 applying negatively.

Well, planar magnetics don't really care about output impedence.With dynamics it can make a big difference but with planar magnetics it doesn't effect the sound, you can use whatever output impedence you feel like using.

 

[MrMateoHead]

Thanks for the advice! I noticed the O2 amp has an output impedance of 0.5, so this should, atleast in theory, sound quite a bit better with the HE-400 than the E9.
Then again, My gmp 8.35D has an impedance of 35 ohm, but it sounds really nice through the E9.

If I understand you correctly, than something with a high output impedance like the traktor audio 2 (100 ohm indeed) should sound worse with headphone that have low impedance. 
However this dac is meant for typical DJ headphones that have a relatively low impedance. And the traktor audio 2 did sound much better with low impedance headphones than the HD650.
So it can't be just the rule of 8 applying negatively.

What - the HE400 does?  No way...

Innerfidelity claims the HD650 needs 0.13mW to reach 90 dB.
They also claim the HE-400 needs 0.33mW to reach 90 dB. So, mW to mW, you need about 2.5 times the power to drive the HE-400's to an equivalent level as the HD 650. Hence my assertion.

Its not that the power requirement of the HE-400 forces you to have a massive amp - it doesn't. For the sake of having adequate volume and headroom however, I think 0.5-1W is necessary.

MarleyBob - I can vouch for the O2 - it kicks butt and has plenty of juice for the HE-400, and virtually anything else you throw at it. The Traktor audio 2 you refer to, according to their website, is rated to drive headphones from 8-600 Ohms, and produce 100 mWs @100 Ohms. Given that, generally speaking, power would double at half that impedance, it should do something like 200 mWs @50 Ohms, and 400 mWs @ 25 Ohms. It depends on the design of the amp, but this suggests to me that output impedance is actually low! So that would explain why it seems to work well with lower impedance phones. But again I am no expert, and without more information about the amp, its hard to know if it should or shouldn't sound great with a variety of phones. But it certainly would have enough power to get loud with HE-400s.

That said, I recommend the O2

 

[Marleybob217]

Quote:

That said, I recommend the O2

Well I sold the traktor audio 2 for a reason, it wasn't any good (actually not That bad).
 
I'm gonna see how I like the HUD-MX1 & E9 & HE-400 setup first. If money is available, ever, I'll definitely think about buying the O2!

 

[TunneLVisioN42]

Waiting for mine in the mail, would you guys say these greatly contrast DT880's thats the impression im getting, after i got my beyers I love listening to female vocals!

 

[MattTCG]

The dt880 is very flat...vanilla ice cream. The he400 is not flat...read, triple chocolate chunk. 

 

[Mad Lust Envy]

If you want DT880 type of flat, go with the HE-4.

That's the planar vanilla with some sprinkles on the top.

 

[MattTCG]

Quote:

If you want DT880 type of flat, go with the HE-4.

That's the planar vanilla with some sprinkles on the top.

 
Good point...