Quote:
Unfortunately there ain't as many choice as it seems. I can see why RockChip is used as they do provide a good level of hardware design for their customer (meaning they will help you in designing the PCB so it will work fine for what you want to do). Plus they are not quite as choosy on their clientele and will work for small companies for relatively low price. These factors make them a popular for all local Chinese companies (in fact rumor has said that ColorFly is using RockChip as well, but remarked the chip as 'C4'). The downside is of course the immaturity of the RockChip's software platform, making it extra hard to get the firmware right. I have heard the RockChip may be going to adapt ARM structure in the future that aims to support Andriod natively. That will be great but I guess we still have a long way to go.
It's a pity that HD chose to make it as a rockchip based player. Certainly there could've been other choices.
Unfortunately there ain't as many choice as it seems. I can see why RockChip is used as they do provide a good level of hardware design for their customer (meaning they will help you in designing the PCB so it will work fine for what you want to do). Plus they are not quite as choosy on their clientele and will work for small companies for relatively low price. These factors make them a popular for all local Chinese companies (in fact rumor has said that ColorFly is using RockChip as well, but remarked the chip as 'C4'). The downside is of course the immaturity of the RockChip's software platform, making it extra hard to get the firmware right. I have heard the RockChip may be going to adapt ARM structure in the future that aims to support Andriod natively. That will be great but I guess we still have a long way to go.