[GL1TCH3D]

Here's that picture of the Grado SR80i that I saw:

 

[miceblue]

Because it was all over the news yesterday/today.

Superior sound quality.

The signature Beats by Dr. Dre sound profile delivers pure audio integrity for crystal clear highs, signature bass and sonically true mids.

Aww yeah let the trolling begin. XD

Also, that hinge mechanism.......looks familiar.

 

[Doc-holliday]

Here's that picture of the Grado SR80i that I saw:

Hey nice one Gl1tch3d! Good shot.

 

[veyrongatti]

saw an XB500 in chatswood sydney 

 

[veyrongatti]

Quote:

Because it was all over the news yesterday/today.


Aww yeah let the trolling begin. XD
Also, that hinge mechanism.......looks familiar.

Is sony making beats? 

 

[nikkojames15]

Oh great. Another Beats product. -.- Oh well. At least this one "actually" looks nice. Just remove that huge b logo. Looks like leather too.
Beats Electronics claims they produce sonically true mids. We'll see.

 

[pdiddypdler]

Quote:

Here's that picture of the Grado SR80i that I saw:

Is it legal to take pictures of people in public without consent and post them on the internet? I sure wouldn't want it.

 

[firev1]

Quote:

Saw a guy with some shure 840s at uni today, his pocket was looking especially bulky, I guess he was amping them.

I used to have a O2 in my pants amping 840s as well, till someone complaint how inappropriate it was, if you know what I mean. Saw a westone and phonak this week, both IEMs are extremely popular here.

 

[dukewilloman]

Quote:

That could have been me o.o
I bought my T5ps in Florida and brought them back with me here in Montreal xD

 

Saw a nice review of T5p: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKMkkV636Oo&feature=plcp

 

[liamstrain]

Quote:

Is it legal to take pictures of people in public without consent and post them on the internet? I sure wouldn't want it.

 
In the US, in public? Generally. You are just not allowed to use the image for commercial purposes (e.g. Not sell it to Grado for their ads). 

 

[GL1TCH3D]

Is it legal to take pictures of people in public without consent and post them on the internet? I sure wouldn't want it.

I'm fairly certain it's legal provided that it's a public area and that I'm not using the picture for financial gain (in which case I would need consent).

 

[Doc-holliday]

of course it's legal. otherwise paparazzi wouldn't have a job. i plan on sneaking a shot the next time i see something more rare than a pair of (b), but I'll prolly ask or blur the face just in case it turns out to be one of you ......

 

[liamstrain]

Note. It is NOT legal everywhere (readers in France, take note - Cartier Bresson would be sued for his iconic images today). But as I said, generally speaking, in the US and on public property, it is. 
 
Further note: I am not an attorney, and this should not be construed as all inclusive legal advice. This is just my experience, and knowledge as a professional photographer in the united states.

 

[PinoyPogiman]

Quote:

Note. It is NOT legal everywhere (readers in France, take note - Cartier Bresson would be sued for his iconic images today). But as I said, generally speaking, in the US and on public property, it is. 
 
Further note: I am not an attorney, and this should not be construed as all inclusive legal advice. This is just my experience, and knowledge as a professional photographer in the united states.

i feel fine to get taken a Pic of me and my Grado sr80i's anytime.
 
of course as long as  i know where the picture will be sent to.
 
so if you are in Virginia, you might see mee!!!

 

[Doc-holliday]

Here is what was roaming the streets of Hollywood this afternoon.. Nothing too exciting...

Sony MDR-ZX100:

And I found one other with sound quality about the same as the sony........

Spoiler: Warning! DO NOT CLICK HERE!!!!!

They didn't mind giving me a pic of their cans....