ThickGlasses
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
- Posts
- 1,434
- Likes
- 71
I think the XB1000s would look unproportional on anyone, those things are massive, especially for portable use!
They look fine on cats.
I think the XB1000s would look unproportional on anyone, those things are massive, especially for portable use!
audiophile is a tricky term. Even many users on head-fi are hesitant to say they are with some reason. I've seen lots of head-fiers saying "I'm not a real audiophile, but I think...". On the other hand, some random people with crap headphone claims to be audiophile.
I had a roommate call himself an audiophile. He likes to think very highly of himself. Yet he has zero headphones and I'm pretty sure he didn't even have speakers. He still helped me try and explain to my other roommate why beats are crap but. I have a pair of magnums, and have gone through an array of headphones, yet I don't even consider myself an audiophile...
Technically speaking, an audiophile is a person having an ardent interest in stereo or high-fidelity sound reproduction. And high-fidelity means the reproduction of sound with little distortion, giving a result very similar to the original.
So I can't really say that I myself am an audiophile, since I prefer colouration. But still, I know I love listening to music and care how your audio gear brings out the awesomeness in your music track.
In other news, I saw a M100 on the way to school. Wohoo!!!
And also saw a Ultrasone DJ1 Pro while listening to let it go covers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCxh29luJtg
Huh. I've never seen anything which can be considered audiophile quality here at TP.
There's an M50 prominently featured in some commercial for a medication marketed towards middle-aged women here in the States. I'd link to it, but I can't remember what it was.