Singleton
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2014
- Posts
- 92
- Likes
- 24
Also in Bluetooth settings try another Bluetooth Audio Codec after a factory reset.
So the thread title asks if we're there yet.... I'm not sure.
I think I'll be retiring my Galaxy Buds in favor of a Blon BL03 and an ES100. These $36 IEM's with the ES100 definitely sound much better to me than the Galaxy Buds.
Also in Bluetooth settings try another Bluetooth Audio Codec after a factory reset.
What?! You mean it's not really 6D stereo sound?!I am also kinda laughing and head shaking at that statement ... a whole generation is growing up on those mono BT speakers that sound more or less terrible, but are considered good as long as they have lots of bass! These kids are now discovering TWS ... and what we used to call 'stereo' is now known as 3D sound![]()
i responded to people who wrote "just as the artist /audio engineers intended" so often in this forum that I started to get tired and just leave them be.
most who made that statement never worked in audio fields. even if they do, but still make that statement, they usually are not very adaptive to varying situations and have questionable work flow.
What?! You mean it's not really 6D stereo sound?!
The QCC3020 chip is amazing as the Bluetooth connection is strong and stable along with making AptX Codec sound crystal clear and 99.9% latency free so essentially making TWS sound like a wired pair of IEMs especially with TWS plus.
To add onto your point, I've used some AptX TWS that had more latency than AAC or SBC. The chipset is just a base the manufacturer has to build off of. AptX GENERALLY has lower latency than AAC or SBC, but there are lots of things the manufacturer can do wrong to make it not true. Using a junk antenna is one. AptX doesn't magically make headphones better, in SQ or latency.no it doesn't. AptX is not comparable to wired IEMs in SQ. i use the bt20s and wires sound better with the IEMs no matter what. sorry but your post sound like an ad for soundPEATS.
To add onto your point, I've used some AptX TWS that had more latency than AAC or SBC. The chipset is just a base the manufacturer has to build off of. AptX GENERALLY has lower latency than AAC or SBC, but there are lots of things the manufacturer can do wrong to make it not true. Using a junk antenna is one. AptX doesn't magically make headphones better, in SQ or latency.
Or amp to drive the dynamic drivers well. I suspect it's the weak sauce amps to save battery life on TWS.Do not forget the driver also![]()
Of course! I was just referring to latency as @Singleton said AptX made TWS 99% lag free. But yeah there's lots of units with AptX and terrible sound due to poorly tuned drivers!Do not forget the driver also![]()