ehjie
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2009
- Posts
- 3,566
- Likes
- 6,480
THE 2.0 Tuning is a keeper....I am still looking for asg2.0
THE 2.0 Tuning is a keeper....I am still looking for asg2.0
I have 3 , asg2.5 , 2 asg1plus , asg1.5 asg1 ,rockets , spearlab Triton 1 and special asg1plus and special experimental iemWhat else did they do? Want to share a pic?
I have 2x pairs ASG 2.5 but still looking for ASG 2.0
I had them in the past but I had to sell them
Just got a pair of ten 3 new for 350. Really hard to find any info abt them online. Audited them side by side with mine JH Lola. How good are these ten3? I dont miss the Lola even though ten3 was running on 3.5 n Lola was on 4.4.balanve on shanling m3x. Comparatively good! Lola has a wider stage and sweeter highs. Clarity..bass were just as good. Love it. ! Now I am keen to hear the thirteen 6! How good can it get?Hi hope everyone is staying safe ! I’m curious if anyone has any impressions on the ten 3? I picked them up blind used. I’m just waiting for them to be shipped to me. Thanks
Me too! When I rea this thread on fender then saw aurisonic..that was like 13 years(or more!) ago when I test the ash cos it had a bass port for tuning bass..but price wise was out of my budget. Loved it. But compared to today's flagship iem prices...it's nothingI don't know where iv been for the last decade but i have only just found out Fender bought out Aurisonics! Lol i know bad being a die hard basshead iv always wanted a set off AG.2.5/2.0's but they are like gold dust so gave up!
So after a bit of research am i right in thinking the Fender FX series are in fact the Aurisonics Bravo Series? If this is the case my important question is.
Are the Fender FXA2 exactly the same as the Aurisonics Kicker?
Are the Fender FXA6 exactly the same as the Aurisonics Forte?
I'm down sizing my collection a bit and want an exellent basshead monitor for out & about going balanced out my ES100 MK2. I assume the bass quantity is the same on both models but adding the BA to the FXA6 brings better technicalities?
You bought yours from TC Accoustic?Very little info on the thirteen 6 online. O ly 3 I found..
One says it's very good..need good dap but ex.
Ones says channel imbalance n sounds like cheap dynamic iem w little extension beyond bass.
Another compared it to ten 5 and said thirteen6 dont sound as good but could be due to lack of burning in. (Abt 60hrs burn in he said)
Of cos..plus comments in this thread...Seems to suggest that it's a good iem but not easy to drive..
Will stick to ten 3 for now...too much to spend on something w so little info.(N mostly negative or neutral)