RONJA MESCO
1000+ Head-Fier
Great, shroud this thing in secrecy...
Should be interesting. Used to love Yamaha equipment and would love to see them return to prominence.Exclusive First Listen: Experience Yamaha’s Unreleased Head-Fi Models
This year, Yamaha is offering Head-Fi enthusiasts an exclusive chance to experience two unreleased Head-Fi models. Be among the first in the world to explore our latest range and immerse yourself in True Sound.
Don’t miss out!
◆Australian Hi-Fi Show Sydney: 4-6 April 2025 (Australia)
⇒ https://www.whathifi.com/news/australian-hi-fi-show-2025-coming-attractions-room-by-room
⇒ https://yamahamusic.formtitan.com/ftproject/aushifishow
◆AXPONA: 11-13 April 2025 (USA)
⇒ https://axpona.com/
◆HIGH END Munich 2025: 15-18 May 2025 (Germany)
⇒ https://www.highendsociety.de/high-end-44.html
THe YH-5000SE was the initial expensive product, and TOTL, that was demonstrating the R&D and work involved to revive Yamaha's planar tech.The fact is the innovation and technology that go into something like an MPD8 or Immanis are not cheap. People want to think their topping DAC can compete and that all DACs measure the same so that means it can when you actually listen to these devices on the same headphone and compare them the difference is obvious and laughable. The measurement boys haven't done these comparisons and hence they have no idea what they are talking about. Even my Chord Dave was completely trounced by the MPD-8.
Yes, you're right. You get 2% more sound quality for 800% more cash outlay.Find me a DAC as good as MPD8 at a low price, find me an IEM as good as APX SE at a low price, find me a headphone as good as Immanis at a low price. Price is correlated to sound quality.
Sorry Beagle but your ears aren't sophisticated enough.Yes, you're right. You get 2% more sound quality for 800% more cash outlay.
At this point, it seems like you are deliberately spreading misinformation.Love Yamaha and especially their older planar magnetics that pioneered great sound back in the day. Some of them even compete with headphones from today’s market, which is a feat in itself.
Worryingly though they also compete with the regular YH5000se - in fact as far as sound quality is concerned - quite easily stomp over Yamaha’s newest flagship…which is a problem imho.
The old school Yamaha planars were and are extremely natural sounding whereas the YH5000se sounds weird with all kinds of weird on top. To me and to many I know the old guard is just waaaaay better.
Now I went into the YH5000se thinking and hoping it would be the new king of the market. I quite simply adore the design language and the comfort is to die for. What I hadn’t expected was a planar magnetic take on Grado; subbass roll-off, enormous peak in the upper mids (Grado-styled) followed by a large hole in the treble and an overall lack of refinement.
One of the rare few cans I’ve ever tried that manages to sound SHOUTY and cavernous at the same time.
My hope for this new iteration - if it is a new iteration(?) - is that Yamaha has managed to squeeze in a natural sound signature heralding their own adventure in planar magnetics. I think Yamaha’s back history deserves a grand gesture![]()
I'm sorry, but I've spent close to 6 years critically listening to audio. I am confident in my judgment about what my ears hear. That's 6 years of listening to sound—not enjoying music. I don't need anyone to school me about what my ears are hearing, trying to convince me that my ears and head have changed. You're gaslighting; you're not even trying to hide that. I have a good idea about the kind of an individual you are. That's very apparent from just taking a peek at your activity history and reading the "About" section on your profile.No amp, dac, streamer, dap or cable is going to remove a large peak from the presentation. That is just outside of the laws of physics. I do believe that some can get used to the presentation - so much so that what earlier sounded like a peak to them now sounds like welcoming detail, sure…but the peak is still there. It’s the listener’s ears and head that have changed
[YH-5000SE] is simply unlike any other. Those who haven't heard this range of variation firsthand cannot comprehend it, nor can they accept it, apparently. As a critic, I don't get brain burn-in—I don't get used to sound. The best way I can describe my approach to judging sound is by comparing it to the sensation of touch. Imagine you have a textured surface and you run your finger over it. If you are running your finger over it for a while, you'll lose the intensity and the depth of the surface texture. When I am composing reviews, each time I put the headphones on is a fresh sensory experience. My ears and brain hit a factory reset button each time I take the headphones off my head. A sharp edge is a sharp edge, it doesn't become dull once you run your finger over it. |
I just wanted to chime in about your thoughts on the original Yamaha orthos. I bought my first good headphone when i was a teen and it was the Yamaha HP-1. I also had the YHD 1, 2 and 3 in the late 80's. I still use an HP-1 in my recording system down stairs. They are some of the smoothest, natural sounding headphones I've had.I was very close to putting you on ignore the last time we crossed paths @voja. To be completely honest with you, I had a hard time understanding how you could be so condescending to another member simply because they had a different opinion than you.
It’s now very clear to me that is indeed who you are. Life is going to treat you hard, if you attack everyone with a different viewpoint than you.
Welcome to my ignore list.
Peace.
I had my money on this guy trying to play the victim card—and guess what? He ended up putting me on the ignore list after I dismantled his claims. I spoke too much truth, and it seems that was more than he could handle. Typical.I was very close to putting you on ignore the last time we crossed paths @voja. To be completely honest with you, I had a hard time understanding how you could be so condescending to another member simply because they had a different opinion than you.
It’s now very clear to me that is indeed who you are. Life is going to treat you hard, if you attack everyone with a different viewpoint than you.
Welcome to my ignore list.
Peace.
He argued that the only way to verify a claim such as "All swans are white" would be if one could theoretically observe all swans, which is not possible. On the other hand, the falsifiability requirement for an anomalous instance, such as the observation of a single black swan, is theoretically reasonable and sufficient to logically falsify the claim.
Rejecting the intersubjective consensus about YH-5000SE's capability to sound natural and different from how you are describing it ≠ an opinion. If your claims were defensible, you’d address the raised arguments, not retreat. You're well aware of what you're doing, but fine, run away from a civil debate.Popper's idea to solve this problem is that while it is impossible to verify that every swan is white, finding a single black swan shows that not every swan is white. Such falsification uses the valid inference modus tollens: if from a law L we logically deduce Q, but what is observed is ¬Q, we infer that the law L is false. For example, given the statement L = "all swans are white", we can deduce Q = "the specific swan here is white", but if what is observed is ¬Q = "the specific swan here is not white" (say black), then "all swans are white" is false. More accurately, the statement Q that can be deduced is broken into an initial condition and a prediction as in C ⇒ P in which C = "the thing here is a swan" and P = the thing here is a white swan". If what is observed is C being true while P is false (formally, C ∧ ¬P), we can infer that the law is false.
I'm not trying to get personal. My issue is with the absolutist claims being made here. Someone tested the YH-5000SE on a few expensive toys and is now presenting their limited experience as the definitive truth. Meanwhile, they’ve dismissed observations from others (including myself) that contradict their narrative. I am confronting them about it.I've been hanging out in the Schiit Happened thread for 10 years or so (over 12,000 pages of comments). Not once have I seen people getting personal in their criticisms (at least that I remember). I've already seen multiple instances on this thread and we're only on page 2. I am enjoying this change of pace, but it probably isn't a good idea to continue this. It's just headphones
and stuff; Supposedly for our enjoyment. Peace my friends! Enjoy the music!![]()