XIV > R
XIV More musical
I'm more of R > XR, more transparent and better clarity.
XIV > R
XIV More musical
If you get the opportunity to try the PW Audio 1960's 2 wire with Zeus I advise you do. This cable is significantly better than the handful of other quite high end cables I have tried. Wonderful with Zeus. It is stupidly expensive, but so is Zeus, and so is my DAP. This whole game is for the crazy in terms of $, so in my opinion spending 35% of what the Zeus cost on a stellar cable that takes it to the next level is worth it.
Note that I actually hear quite significant differences with cable rolling.
Wow, that's a great picture. What model did you get?My very first CIEM!
The Adel Athena!Wow, that's a great picture. What model did you get?
Nice, enjoy!The Adel Athena!
My very first CIEM!
Hey, for those who are considering getting an AK Kann, here's my initial impression done using Zeus R.
Initial impressions of Kann
I'm going to share some initial impressions here. I'd like to arrange my content into non-sound and sound. And when I talk about sound quality, I will interject with some comparisons with other DACs that I've experience with. For the record I use EE Zeus R with a DIY cable that is made to the same configuration as the Reference 8, but with thicker conductors, SE connector.
Non sound:
1. Kann is lighter than it looks. Feels similar to a smartphone+mojo stack, without the annoying usb cable.
2. Physical buttons are relocated to the bottom bezel of the screen. I find it to be a decent replacement of the on-screen software buttons, but as a replacement for the original side buttons, they are rather inaccessible.
3. The volume knob feels great. Neither too tight nor too loose. However, I've noticed significant variations between the two units I have tried - Music Sanctuary's demo set and my own set. Both units were fresh out of the box (I witnessed the unboxing of the demo). The volume knob of the demo unit is much tighter than that of mine. I don't really know why, but I don't really like the idea of my Kann being loose (lol I just Kann't resist mentioning the pun)
4. Slightly warm when playing back while connected to computer to transfer data.
5. Having no case is not deal-breaker, but it's definitely something I am disappointed at.
Sound:
1. Hiss is noticeable especially playing back at low volume. Can get very obvious or even disruptive at the end of songs.
2. Overall warm tonality out of the box, slight treble roll-off. Very detailed and transparent. More transparent and airy than Opus#2 actually.
3. Soundstage is wider than that on Opus#2, on par with DX200. Imaging is not as precise as the Lotoo Paw Gold and Kann doesn't sound so exciting.
4. Bass is well layered and well controlled but lacks the sub-bass rumble of Opus #2. Bass quantity of these two players are similar.
5. Mids are well-bodied. Kann mids has more body than DX200, and is more forward as well. But it is not as thick as that on Opus#2.
6. Treble is laid back. It's definitely not as sparkle-y as Plenue S or LPG, but I find it very comfortable, and sufficient in bringing out the air in the tracks.
Getting a PWaudio 1960 4-wire cable soon. Will give more impressions soon, perhaps on 2.5mm balanced output.
My very first CIEM!