Inks
An expert on his own opinion.
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2007
- Posts
- 4,776
- Likes
- 364
The midrange is thick and chesty and you may not over that at all, so we'll see.
It's been quite a while since I posted in this thread. To be honest I have been planning to send my SM3 back and get them reshelled/fixed under warranty if possible and then sell them. But I recently bought my first pair of Shure IEM's (SE215) and while I quickly tried my Sensorcom tips from my SM3 on them it only dawned on me tonight to try the Shure tips on the SM3. All I can say is the Olives do something for me with the SM3. Suddenly the bass has more kick to it and even the treble is lifted a bit. This has caught me off guard as I expected more of a Comply type effect with even more reduced treble.
It just shows how tip dependent these are and how these can go from blah to fun and enjoyable if a person can just get the right mix. The jury is still out if these will stay in my stable but right now I am at least leaning back that way.
the SM3 is much more sensitive than the IE8, per the spec's.
i always though it was otherwise, but it could be my rusty math thats the cause.
...
Franck EarSonics to me
Hi,
I have understood your question. Our SM3 are perfectly matched to have the same L R response. (+ - 0,5db)
When you do remolding, it's modify the sound and can modify L R matching of course..
sincerely,
Franck LOPEZ
Got my reply regarding how tightly Earsonics matches the drivers if anyone's interested:
Quote:Franck EarSonics to me
Hi,
I have understood your question. Our SM3 are perfectly matched to have the same L R response. (+ - 0,5db)
When you do remolding, it's modify the sound and can modify L R matching of course..
sincerely,
Franck LOPEZ