Lurker0
Headphoneus Supremus
I've edited the previous post several times, slowly understanding the source of the problem. Please re-read to be sure you have read the latest version. Sorry!
Hmmm, I was using Win32 Disk Imager under Windows 10 Pro (64-bit) but I don't think it'll matter. I'm using a 64GB SanDisk card. I have an Image File for input (which I put the sdupdate.img), and a Device (where G: is the MicroSD)I tried with Win32 Disk Imager only under WinXP, and it worked fine. But in the drop down list there were two choices for one removable drive: for the card reader (first) and SD card in it (second), and I used the second, with the drive letter.
Moreover, this image was created with Disk Imager, so it must work, being used correctly.
About the file disk device on MacOS, the devices are marked as /dev/disk1, etc. Partitions are marked as /dev/disk1s1.With dd, you need to write to the disk device, not to the partition on it, i.e. to /dev/sdc and not to /dev/sdc1.
Strictly speaking - yes, it is not bootable, because it is physical disk image, not logical disk (partition) image. Physical disk image starts with a partition table, not a boot sector. OK, with HDDs, the MBR contains both partition table and initial boot code. But, obviously, this boot code is useless for ARM CPU
Being correctly written, the resulting SD card should show (using a good disk manager) 165MB of "unused space" (ARM boot code), and then one almost 4GB FAT32 partition labeled "DX200UPDATE". Then can be unused space for a card larger than 4GB.
Have you read that I've put wrong link to SD card image file (DX200FirmwareUpdater.zip), and I have corrected it? You are trying to write firmware image to SD card (sdupdate.img)!Hmmm
Yes as such my comment in the previous post :-Have you read that I've put wrong link to SD card image file (DX200FirmwareUpdater.zip), and I have corrected it? You are trying to write firmware image to SD card (sdupdate.img)!
Edit: I've just seen your latest post. Will re-read.
Thanks a lot for your efforts and sorry for the mistake that led to confusion!Now it looks much better!!
Does anyone use the DX200 lineout to a balanced desktop amp? To run balanced, I think you are limited to the Amp 3 balanced out or just using the balanced HO of any of the other amp modules and maxing out the volume to mimick a lineout (although this would be double amping I think). I would prefer to just use the 4.4mm balanced HO of Amp 8 rather than buy an Amp 3 just for the balanced lineout. Any thoughts on this?
I had been using this for a long time, Amp8 balanced out with max volume into balanced in on my SuSy. It sounds even better than Amp3 balanced line out
Did you use a 4.4mm male to dual 3 pin xlr cable to connect to you balanced amp? That is what I need and this cable doesn't appear to be very common.
Exactly what I was hoping to hear! I'd really prefer not to have to switch amp modules just to use line out to another amp. Did you use a 4.4mm male to dual 3 pin xlr cable to connect to you balanced amp? That is what I need and this cable doesn't appear to be very common.
@Whitigir, how much do you gain from going line out of amp8 into your desktop amp? I’ve compared DX208 to my full desktop rig and I’ve gone digital out to my desktop DAC to desktop amp. However, I’ve never tried DX208 straight into my Moon 430. Is it worth the trouble of making the cable and extra setup over straight out of amp8?I had been using this for a long time, Amp8 balanced out with max volume into balanced in on my SuSy. It sounds even better than Amp3 balanced line out
What's your impression of Solaris with Amp8. Based on what I read about Solaris, it's sort of like a new word in IEM world!Campfire Audio Solaris, Symbio Peel(ed) Mandarines tips, CA 4.4mm super litz cable, iBasso DX200 with Amp8.