The spring sale poster seems to show the Zen Pro at $749, which seems like it's a mistake.
That's correct, thanks for catching!
Just look where the DK2001 led me... Mmm sweet
Live long and prosper
Nice! What kind of music do you like with it?
I found out about the SA6 Ultra after I got into more audiophile IEMs and was bummed out about it because it sounds like the ideal IEM for me. Thinking about pulling the trigger for the SA6 but might wait for the mk2 and see how it compares sonically to the Ultra
Soon
So, I finalized my review of the Dunu Kima.
They are competent in terms of tuning, come with excellent accesories, have a great build, and the price is not too absurd.
Sadly, the market has become so saturated that it’s difficult to stand out by being “good enough”. You have to go the extra mile or offer something unique – two aspects that are sorely missing in most recent releases. The Kima are no exceptions. They are a sidegrade to the existing Titan S. A different tuning, but not a product that shifts the paradigm.
Thankfully, the Kima are pleasing to listen to, so even though they do not excite, they do not offend either. If you found the Titan S to be too sterile and clinical, give the Kima a shot. Their warmth might just convince you.
You can read the full review here: https://www.audioreviews.org/dunu-kima-review-kmmbd/
Thanks so much sir!
Dunu SA4
Warnings - Headphones used with stock tips and cables;
- Sources: E1DA 9038s 2.5mm and the Meizu Hifi Pro 3.5mm;
- SA4 used in default mode;
- I'm just a headphone enthusiast, not a professional reviewer;
- I'm not a native English speaker, sorry for possible translation errors;
- Some impressions about an inear released only in the asian market;
As far as the SA4's sonic presentation is concerned, overall it's balanced and smooth. The mids are bright and appear a little more prominent than the other frequency ranges. The highs are more restrained, with a smoother sound, but still have a good aplomb. The bass is neutral, well extended and with a good impact and texture. In addition, it has a good soundstage and good spatiality.
Bass, in particular, packs a punch, but compared to the bass typical of dynamic drivers, it can sound drier. However, this doesn't negatively affect the sound quality, and I appreciate this approach, as the bass remains well defined and controlled.
The mids have a bit more kick and are presented clearly and without harshness. While the overall sound delivery is balanced, there can be a slight lack of warmth in the female vocals region. The "atmosphere enhancement" mode helps with this in the midrange, but can negatively affect the sense of space, making the sound a bit closed off.
High-pitched sounds were the most challenging to understand, as in some cases the range can be somewhat limited. In particular, the drum cymbals lack luster on some recordings. However, usually this glow is present, albeit softer. What's more, the highs don't seem to lack resolution. The good thing is that it sounds harmless and never fatiguing for long hours of listening, reminding me a little of my old Tin Hifi T2 in that sense.
When comparing the SA4 to the 7Hz Timeless, the SA4 has a more balanced and smoother sound, with good separation between the instruments and a more three-dimensional soundstage. On the other hand, Timeless has a more energetic sound, with fuller bass and brighter highs, which provide a feeling of greater detail and fulfillment. In summary, the SA4 offers a more balanced sound with good spatiality, while the Timeless has a more intense and detailed sound.
Ok, I see,
Every so often I see sets sold on ebay &/or AliX. Not really aimed at western markets per se...
Correct, it's not coming out in the states anytime soon (or at all currently).