kloan
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2004
- Posts
- 1,166
- Likes
- 13
You must like treble! I find even with the foams the high end is too much.
Originally Posted by kloan /img/forum/go_quote.gif ... do tone down the high end a little bit, but still not quite enough. I also think the bass isn't nearly as impactful as the IE8 ... |
Originally Posted by cn11 /img/forum/go_quote.gif Okay, one thing I want to note in the early stages at this point (I don't want to discuss too much about the audio qualities before a little more burn in takes place)- I really am blown away by the level of dynamics these maintain at lower listening volumes. Only the Ultrasone 780's are this satisfying down low like this. This is a great quality since it'll encourage me to keep it down. |
Originally Posted by cn11 /img/forum/go_quote.gif To my ears it seems that the FX500's reach a little lower than the IE8's, and it's more controlled too. There's less mid bass coloration, which helps it all seem cleaner on the low end. |
Originally Posted by shigzeo /img/forum/go_quote.gif funny, i took out the filter to expose the top end even more! but, i was coming from er4s and the denon c700, both of which are more energetic in treble than the victor. |
Originally Posted by cn11 /img/forum/go_quote.gif gameboy115- The size of the soundstage is definitely a bit smaller with the FX500's, but not much at all. By comparison, I find it larger than with the Denon C700's, Turbines, or Atrios. It's second only to the IE8's. And I kind of hesitate to give a very concrete answer at this point because I know they may still be evolving through burn in since this only the second full day I've had them. I was just doing direct back to back comparing with the IE8's to give you a good answer, and just now tonight I found it much closer than I remember in comparing them last night. So, more to come......... |