As one of several people who have followed every page of this thread, from its release-day beginning, I have to say this seems to be quite a popular perspective on Mojo - for some, it immediately impresses, but a substantial number of people find that no one area of its musical presentation immediately stands-out, during first listening, but rather that it gradually reveals itself to be particularly capable in several aspects. One notable example of this, is the detail in the presentation. Some DACs have slightly emphasised treble presentation which can initially sound impressively-detailed, but may eventually become a little fatiguing to the ears (my own experience of this happens to be with a DAP - iBasso's now-discontinued DX100, but many will have experienced something similar, with various other digital products, irrespective of whether the subjective treble emphasis may be intentional or perhaps, in some instances, an inadvertent artifact of poor digital design/implementation). But the Mojo doesn't seem to emphasise the treble, and yet provides loads of detail, which, although not necessarily immediately apparent, does become enjoyable, as time goes on. I noticed this within 7-8 days. For some it will be sooner, for others later. For me, I had a tendency to listen a bit too loud during the first few days (funnily enough, I found myself doing exactly the same thing with Hugo, which I had on-loan for a while, a year or so earlier. I think my urge to push the SPL of both Hugo & Mojo stems from the fact that I find both products to have an addictively-dynamic and rhythmic presentation - whether that's primarily due to the high-tap-count WTA filter, I can't say for sure, but it's certainly possible). After I'd become disciplined enough to curtail my listening volume to something more sensible (and safer!), the delicacy of Mojos treble gradually became more apparent to me.
. 
