pearljam50000
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Posts
- 1,095
- Likes
- 89
Is there any chance the price will drop to 1000$ one day?
I'm a bit suprised that there's so little talk about the crossfeed filters in the Hugo. I was first introduced to listening with crossfeed in Fideila (mac osx). But I think the crossfeed is actually better in the Hugo. With Fidelia the crossfeed makes the bass impact weaker. Crossfeed in the Hugo doesn't affect bass impact at all.
I prefer the lowest setting of crossfeed (red light). It's subtle, but the effect is still very noticable. It makes listening over longer periods less fatiguing, and quite often it sounds better. But that depends alot on the recordings. I listen to alot of jazz and classical, and often the instruments are placed extremely far to the sides. Crossfeed "fixes" this. I just like how easy it is to just press a button to get the effect.
I can't hear any difference between crossfeed ON or OFF ! anyone else ? I must really have bad Ears ?
I can't hear any difference between crossfeed ON or OFF ! anyone else ? I must really have bad Ears ?
How much? 300k? I'll stick wit the Hugo. An outstanding dac at any price.
I get your point, but Again at what cost? The Hugo gives great sound at a great cost. My point you don't have to spend 300k to get great sound and yes analog can sound good if your willing to pay and put up with snaps crackles and pops.It was a demo room at a Swiss hi-end maker.
So far I have had 3 of them in the Geneva area and that was the 2nd cheapest of the 3 in my quick estimation. CH was less and Goldmund was double that price. CH and Goldmund were an all digital demo. DarTZeel was both analog and digital.
My point was not about the Hugo here, it was about how good analog can sound to an analog agnostic (me).
Sonic, you dont quite get my point. The speakers were $75K the monblocs were $150K and the rest of the gear made up the difference. The TT was a reconstructed vintage and was in my estimate about $30K.
It was not the TT that made the difference though, as not every album was the same. Herve played a CD and then the same vinyl album to demonstrate the difference. I then remarked that vinyl has crackles and I prefer the silence of CDs and then he put on the Supertramps made of some special material and it retained all the analog goodness and was silent as a CD! That vinyl album was better than CD in every single way.
Again, just wait till the QBD updated with Hugo type digital comes out and you will see the true desktop potential of the current Chord/Watts development. I am not sure that ANY digital could beat what I heard off that Supertramp album though...and I am still in the digital camp (it is still the future and will get better). Vinyl is too much hassle. LoL
ALRAINBOW can relieve his pain and suffering by selling his Chord to me at a proper head-fi members price.Couldn't agree more - well said.
Al seems to be looking for the uber-DAC while the rest of us are thrilled silly to get this sort of performance for reasonable money, No small irony that some of the Hugo's harshest critics cant understand why anyone would spend this kind of money on a 'portable DAC', despite the fact that many of them have never even heard it - and we have Al at the other end of the spectrum bitching about the fact that it doesnt cater to his particular niche despite being thousands of dollars cheaper than most of the products currently filling that niche. Portable or no, I cant see why someone who is so clearly invested in desktop gear would hang onto a DAC that clearly isnt doing it for him.
You missed my point I wasn't even talking about cd's
I can't wait for QBD Hugo home version, I just hope it costs less then the Direct Stream Dac, so that more of us regular Joes can enjoy that one as well, also I prefer buying from Chord rather then PS Audio, but that's my preference.
I have boxes of LP's and enjoy records, but your right, compared to Computer audio it gets to be a hassle fast. (Man how times have changed.)