[Slater]

Overall best? Probably the Marshall Mode.

Spoiler: Ehem

This is still the greatest comment of all time pertaining to a certain Marshall Mode:

https://www.head-fi.org/threads/kno...essions-thread.698148/page-1715#post-13879518

 

[B9Scrambler]

This is still the greatest comment of all time pertaining to a certain Marshall Mode:

https://www.head-fi.org/threads/kno...essions-thread.698148/page-1715#post-13879518

That's a classic

 

[Zerohour88]

I am sure my MH755 is underperforming so yes, in this case I believe it is accurate to say that. If I had the same experience as others with the MH755 then I am sure that I would have a different opinion. It has nothing to do with sound signature preference as I have, and enjoy, many different IEMs with different sound profiles. In addition, the build quality and accessories in the ED9 are also much better than the MH755.

well, one of the reason why I hesitate on recommending the MH755 is the amount of fakes in the market

since you don't like them now, you probably won't mind opening them up and seeing the driver inside? Easy enough to do, just apply some pressure on the shell and they should pop open easily (you can also try slowly separating the shells using a thin knife or something)

a genuine MH755 driver should look like this, apparently:

 

[DynamicEars]

Owning TFZ No3 for 2 days, I dare to say I like them more than all my sub $100 iems (including ZS10 pro, BQEYZ KB100, Tinaudio T2, ****, ZSN PRO, ZS6, IT01, CCA C10 etc)
more crazy facts : they will be replacing my Kanas Pro to be my daily beater

 

[BadReligionPunk]

Owning TFZ No3 for 2 days, I dare to say I like them more than all my sub $100 iems (including ZS10 pro, BQEYZ KB100, Tinaudio T2, ****, ZSN PRO, ZS6, IT01, CCA C10 etc)
more crazy facts : they will be replacing my Kanas Pro to be my daily beater

​

Compare to Kanas and IT01 please

 

[DynamicEars]

​

Compare to Kanas and IT01 please

I'm writing detail comparison with Kanas Pro as many people also want to know, will post on chifi thread, maybe tomorrow

short comparison (not A-B ing in details) with IT01 (non s):
No3 have more detailed resolution
No3 have faster decay (agility)
No3 more balanced, IT01 deep v shaped, and in relation with this vocals sounds recessed on IT01
IT01 have bigger sub bass and mid bass with a little bit bleed
No3 have more clarity and transparency (same with KP)
IT01 have more sparkles
Soundstage is much wider on No3

*edit : I have EBX too, you'll find similar level (if not better) of resolution and clarity on No3

 

[slinbin]

I have happely acquired a few reccomendations from this thread. Thank you very much !
BUT; while musical quality is very pleasent the amount of isolation I can acieve with those tested (KZ, CCA, TRN) is no where near what I had with Shure SE215.
I have asked this question in the "help" part of the forum where I bellieve it belongs, but Im loking for a sub 100$ solution, so IO hope it is OK to ask here also.

Does anyone have reccomendations for a good IEM with good isolation ?

Original question in "Help" thread: https://www.head-fi.org/threads/sub-100-with-good-isolation-iems.908886/

 

[FastAndClean]

I have happely acquired a few reccomendations from this thread. Thank you very much !
BUT; while musical quality is very pleasent the amount of isolation I can acieve with those tested (KZ, CCA, TRN) is no where near what I had with Shure SE215.
I have asked this question in the "help" part of the forum where I bellieve it belongs, but Im loking for a sub 100$ solution, so IO hope it is OK to ask here also.

Does anyone have reccomendations for a good IEM with good isolation ?

Original question in "Help" thread: https://www.head-fi.org/threads/sub-100-with-good-isolation-iems.908886/

any closed pure BA earphone with dense filled in resin body will do the trick

 

[Barusu Lamperouge]

I have happely acquired a few reccomendations from this thread. Thank you very much !
BUT; while musical quality is very pleasent the amount of isolation I can acieve with those tested (KZ, CCA, TRN) is no where near what I had with Shure SE215.
I have asked this question in the "help" part of the forum where I bellieve it belongs, but Im loking for a sub 100$ solution, so IO hope it is OK to ask here also.

Does anyone have reccomendations for a good IEM with good isolation ?

Original question in "Help" thread: https://www.head-fi.org/threads/sub-100-with-good-isolation-iems.908886/

Tennmak Pro. Same design as SE215 and sound great as well if you prefer U shaped signature. For me, they're fantastic in terms of comfort and can isolation.

 

[slinbin]

any closed pure BA earphone with dense filled in resin body will do the trick

Yes ! that would appear to be a right choice.
But the IEM's I have acquired so far (CCA, KZ, QKZ, TRN) does not fit that bill:
I really woud appreciate suggestions.

 

[slinbin]

Tennmak Pro. Same design as SE215 and sound great as well if you prefer U shaped signature. For me, they're fantastic in terms of comfort and can isolation.

Thank you, that is exactly the kind of help I was looking for.
They will be on my list

 

[FastAndClean]

Yes ! that would appear to be a right choice.
But the IEM's I have acquired so far (CCA, KZ, QKZ, TRN) does not fit that bill:
I really woud appreciate suggestions.

fiio fa1,
for 20$ more you can get NICEHCK HC5 5BA

 

[slinbin]

fiio fa1,
for 20$ more you can get NICEHCK HC5 5BA

Nice
That is worth investigating more (even if it is over 100$)
Thnks !

 

[surya27895]

I use trn v30 now, is it worth to buy cca c10 if i want an upgrade? Or there is any better option?

My budget is less than $50, already change the cable to trn 8 core and spinfit cp100 too

 

[zazaboy]

@DynamicEars are they easy to drive I mean the tfz no.3?