Yura Buhanovsky
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2016
- Posts
- 16
- Likes
- 12
There are things that is possible, but we, as manufacturer, cannot and will not encourage. Rooting an Android device is one example, and tempering firmware is another. It might work when it was done correctly by expert who knows what they are doing, but can be a disaster when non-technical users are trying to follow suit.
In addition, rooting and/or tempering of firmware will void your warranty, I believe this is a common practice to most, if not all, Android mobile appliance/products.
Of course users are free to discuss or perform whatever they believe as appropriate to their DAP, as long as they are fully aware of the potential consequence, we shall happy to provide limited technical support that is not directly relate to procedure that might endanger warranty coverage.
Yes, I understand what you are saying and you are right of course. I do not want to Root your device (for this to begin with at least a third party should be put recovery example twrp 2.8). I understand what android and how it works (from 2009 on it since version 1.6 and was once even the developer of firmware on xda-Developers).
I just think a reconciliation of time build not just a necessary thing, because it still is a check that the device is Cayin i5 and firmware are set to re-clean (with a wipe) and not as a supplement on top, so kill the device is essentially impossible to jumping from one official firmware on another, including making the downgrade to an earlier version.
Reconciliation takes place in the file META-INF \ com \ google \ android \ updater-script.
Ask your developers, whether it is possible to remove the build string test of time and how it will affect. I am sure that there is nothing wrong if the string removed.