Just got to try the Solaris for literally one song at Audio 46, demo unit but no clue how burned in it could have been (had to rush to catch a train). Small black silicone tips, not SpinFits but unsure what kind, my guess is the stock ones that come with the kit.
Track:
Lo-Fang - #88 (I used my DSD512 version of it, YouTube link for reference. Plus it's a great track!)
Source:
iBasso DX200 w/Amp 8. Using Fidelizer Advanced ROM, in conjunction with the Lurker0 mod via USB Audio Player Pro
Cable:
SXC8, 4.4mm
Extremely brief comparison of track on Solaris vs EE Phantom Custom (Ares II 8- wire on the latter)
First thing I was looking for was bass response. I have read here that Solaris is more of a sub-bass specialist, and that it had less mid-bass than the Phantom, but on this extremely brief initial listen and setup the Solaris had less of both. Could be due to a variety of reasons obviously - tips, cable, fit (my Phantom is custom), ambient mode - but in this case I preferred the Phantom, bass sounded even more like a DD in comparison.
Vocals on Solaris had the appearance of being more forward but my hunch is that this was due to the lesser bass quantity relative to the Phantom. Vocals were also clearer and a bit brighter, while sounding huskier and more intimate on the Phantom.
Soundstage was a wider and taller on Solaris, Phantom had better depth.
All in all my opinion of the Solaris is not formed, I will listen to it more at CanJam NY. But as of this far too quick and semi-ratchet demo, the Solaris matches the average mental impression I have of it by reading the thread, save for the sub-woofer-like bass, but I attribute that to the environment I was in, tips, etc since many of the impressions I hold in highest regard come from those who's preferences seem to match mine (
@davidmolliere being one of them, esp since he has the Phantom).
If I had to pick based on this though, I would stick with the Phantom, as the overall presentation is more organic and natural, while the Solaris is more of a showcase presentation, meaning a grander, more detailed and clearer stage but also more distant.
As for my preferences I prioritize what I consider to be a more natural and lifelike presentation based on being being around musician friends and attending live performances - forward sub-bass and vocals over a treblehead/enormous soundstage/analytical presentation.