Quote:
I don't gree it is a defective product.
At first we design the NFB12 we want to make it different flavor to the NFB11 and I want to make it with smooth sound , and we have mark on our web it is a bit smooth and forgive for source .
It is work on hardware mode, so it is setting is follow the performance request and this is the best setting at 192KHz accept ability .
The table of #577 post, it is so the max oversample setting. The NFB12 want to accept 192KHz oversample so the Pin22 must setting at 1 . Otherwise the NFB12 only can up to 48KHz or 96KHz.
Does anyone had better setting in hardware mode?
LiqTenExp post at #578 just customize setting, in face the USB can accept 96KHz and coaxial/optical can accept 192KHz but he limit USB at 44K and coaxial at 96KHz.
About the high frequency roll off not mean it is a defective product, just read the diagram of #556 I was post, the Simaudio Moon Evolution Andromeda Reference CD player which is a colstly more than USD20K gear, also so the high frequency roll off around -3DB ,does anyone think it is a defective products?
The high frequency roll off define sound flavor, it bring a smooth flavor.
But the roll off not mean its sound unneutral, the neutral is depend on the circuits components less coloration, like some tube gears even without roll off at 20KHz but sound tube like (coloration).
For supercurio: If you define the NFB12 is a defective product, please offer the effective evidence.
For LiqTenExp post at #580, addition a MCU can check the oversample rate and setting the Pin22.
But I think a MCU join in not a good idea for this price rang gear. In this price rang gear , the power supply is limit and the size is quite small, the MCU maybe bring more disturb to the sound make the sound quality degrade .
Hi
I accept the roll-off is design a choice to smooth the sound by killing the highest frequencies.
What I consider as a defect is something else, it's the sampling artifacts due to a misconfiguration of the DACs:
Here is how it appears on previous graphs:
On udial:
On the RMAA test file:
On this graphs, remember that everything that's higher than the center (around 20kHz) is artifacts.
For reference, here is how the first udial should look like: (nothing above 20kHz)
I would suggest you to try by yourself: http://dl.project-voodoo.org/killer-samples/udial.wav
When playing this file on headphones at moderate/high volume clocked at 44K, you'll hear high frequencies artifacts in the second part of the file.
Compare with the NFB-12 clocked at 96 or 192k with a high quality upsampling (or another non-buggy DAC), you'll see the difference.
This is the part I consider as a defect. Simply: bug in the implementation. It's hard to hear because of the additionnal roll-off, but it's there.
But again, if people's are happy with the sound, I'm perfectly happy for them.
My goal is not to trash a product but show technical deficiencies if any in order to see them fixed in future products or revision of the same product.