Astell&Kern Launches New R-2R DAP and IEMs at High End Munich 2023
Feb 29, 2024 at 5:48 PM Post #616 of 721
Hi,
updating previos post:
1) owners of SE300, please, click on connected SSID (network name) and what you see under Link Speed? Is it more than 54 Mbps? Link speed is a maximum theoretical speed of wireless data transmission between your device and the wi-fi access point. It depends on many reasons, including distance between the device and access point. If your far from access point, or you are behing the wall you can see in Link Speed in 802.11 a/g standard - 48, 36, 24 Mbps (54 is the maximum). So if you never see more than 54 Mbps under the Link Speed on SE300 your device working according very very old wireless standard 802.11a/g.
2) just found confirmation on another thread - post from AudioAndCoffee
3) if Astell&Kern publish in datasheet that the SE300 has Wi-Fi capabilites with 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac the Link Speed must be more than 54 Mbps!
 
Last edited:
Mar 1, 2024 at 8:11 AM Post #617 of 721
Mar 3, 2024 at 2:09 PM Post #618 of 721
Hi,
just adding more 2 cents to the discussion...
According Astell&Kern datasheet SE180 has this wireless capabilities - 802.11 b/g/n.
So the PHY Data Rates (Link Speed) can reach as maximum:
- 72 Mbps (20 Mhz, 1SS)
- 144 Mbps (20 Mhz, 2SS)
- 150 Mbps (40 Mhz, 1SS)
- 300 Mbps (40 Mhz, 2SS)
Of course, I don't know how many spatial streams (SS) are supported by the SE180 wireless chip and end users Wi-Fi routers (from the posts quoted below), but these end users reported a maximum Link Speed of 54 Mbps!
I also highly doubt that these end users are using such old equipment nowadays (Wi-Fi routers with 802.11a/b/g standard aka Wi-Fi 3).
Thus, the facts speak for themselves that this is not the first time when there is a discrepancy between the characteristics stated in the specification and the real ones. Unfortunately, I have to draw this conclusion?

1) post from peanutslab
2) post from Joebas
 
Last edited:
Mar 4, 2024 at 7:01 PM Post #620 of 721
Hi, I'm a new member I apologize if this topic has already been discussed and I missed it but what can you tell me about the comparison between SE300 and SP2000T? Which one would be better to buy now?
Greetings, Marcello (Italy)
Just a second to this request. I like my SP2000T but I also use it as a day to feed a large desktop amp. When in this mode, the SP2000T must disable the tube, so I am interested in the se300 as its R2R DAC will continue to be part of the output to an external dac. Anyone had/heard the PS2000T and can compare the sound of the two?
 
Mar 4, 2024 at 9:11 PM Post #621 of 721
Just a second to this request. I like my SP2000T but I also use it as a day to feed a large desktop amp. When in this mode, the SP2000T must disable the tube, so I am interested in the se300 as its R2R DAC will continue to be part of the output to an external dac. Anyone had/heard the PS2000T and can compare the sound of the two?

I’m loving my 2000T as well, and was disappointed I couldn’t use the tube mix alternatives in line out, is this something that can be corrected in a software update, or is a hardware issue?
 
Mar 5, 2024 at 12:32 AM Post #622 of 721
I’m loving my 2000T as well, and was disappointed I couldn’t use the tube mix alternatives in line out, is this something that can be corrected in a software update, or is a hardware issue?

Based upon my rudimentary understanding, the tube is only involved in the amp output stage as part of the hardware set up. This is how they accomplish the flexibility of the player; it is adding the tube on top of the op amp in order to give you the option to go all the way with it, or take it away

I therefore do not believe that a software change will affect feature.
 
Mar 5, 2024 at 2:13 AM Post #623 of 721
Just a second to this request. I like my SP2000T but I also use it as a day to feed a large desktop amp. When in this mode, the SP2000T must disable the tube, so I am interested in the se300 as its R2R DAC will continue to be part of the output to an external dac. Anyone had/heard the PS2000T and can compare the sound of the two?
I'm selling my SE300, in excellent condition, if you're interested
https://www.head-fi.org/classifieds/astell-kern-se300.63529/
 
Mar 5, 2024 at 3:09 PM Post #624 of 721
Guys,
why a lot of people are selling their SE300 at a very low price (sometimes half the price)? I am not facing a major issue with mine that would force me to sell it at such a low price. Do you have a different experience with yours?
 
Mar 5, 2024 at 3:21 PM Post #626 of 721
I just listed mine because I literally cannot stream with it. I thought the newer AK models had improved on this since its advertised to have said capacity. I can't have a desk brick unable to listen to music. I even have trouble with imported music from streaming services. Ah well, such is life.
I agree that the streaming apps are still slow, but you can still stream from your mobile phone that you connect with your SE300. You can also download content and play it offline
Selling your SE300 at half the price gives the impression that it has a major issue which is not the case. It's unfortunate because it sounds amazing compared to other DAPs
 
Mar 5, 2024 at 3:26 PM Post #627 of 721
I agree that the streaming apps are still slow, but you can still stream from your mobile phone that you connect with your SE300. You can also download content and play it offline
Selling your SE300 at half the price gives the impression that it has a major issue which is not the case. It's unfortunate because it sounds amazing compared to other DAPs
it does sound great, but I am not certain how connecting my phone to the device works.
 
Mar 5, 2024 at 4:04 PM Post #628 of 721
I agree that the streaming apps are still slow, but you can still stream from your mobile phone that you connect with your SE300. You can also download content and play it offline
Selling your SE300 at half the price gives the impression that it has a major issue which is not the case. It's unfortunate because it sounds amazing compared to other DAPs

I think you are missing a couple of things about the used market. First, the SE 300 is no longer the newest device offered by the company and so it’s value relative to other newer products, including yet another new one just announced, is going to depreciate.

Second, these players start off very high values, so they have more room to depreciate. Regardless of whether the player sounds good or not and is working well or not it is going to be very difficult for any device in the modern age to hold its value with technology moving forward so fast, especially when it starts off so expensive in the first place.

Think about how many new releases there have been since this released and how many keep coming, technology moves fast and competition is fierce.

Look at how the new Hiby R8ii and its alcantara case is drawing attention. Soon itll be a new hot thing.

Its not the SE300, its just modern tech.
 
Mar 5, 2024 at 4:14 PM Post #629 of 721
Good evening, this is my last post on this topic, here I summarized my thoughts (I won’t do it again)
Dear owners of the SE300, I ask for your help to figure out what is strange in my opinion (after all, it’s 2024) connecting the SE300 to a Wi-Fi wireless network.
Further point by point:
1) I won’t talk about playback quality, overall impression, etc., you can find all this in numerous reviews of this device. I listen mainly to Lossless and Hi-Res Lossless in Apple Music, headphones – Beyerdynamic Amiron Home and T1 Gen2 (depending on my mood). The sound impressions are excellent, otherwise I would write in a slightly different tone. But, as always, there is one nuance that you will not find in the reviews. I'm a network engineer by profession, so let's talk about how the SE300 connects to your/our wireless network.
2) Immediately after purchasing the device, I naturally tried to connect it to my Wi-Fi network (I have separate SSIDs for 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz). The device was unable to connect to the network in the 2.4 GHz band; it only connected to the SSID in the 5 GHz band (this is preferable). Initially, I did not attach any importance to this, but later, due to the slow speed of Wi-Fi, I became interested in why the SE300 itself could not connect to the SSID in the 2.4 GHz band and why was everything so relatively slow? In the SSID settings for 2.4 GHz on the home Wi-Fi router it was “802.11n only”, changed it to “802.11g/n mixed” - the SE300 connected to the network. That is, the connection occurs in the 802.11g standard (Wi-Fi 3). Let me remind you that the maximum channel connection speed (Data Rates) in this standard is 54 Mbps. The suspicion immediately crept in that not everything was clean with the connection in the 5 GHz range. Unfortunately, the capabilities of the home router do not allow for detailed diagnostics; to do this, I connected the SE300 to the corporate network to make sure what standard the connection was using. My suspicions were justified - the SE300 does connect to Wi-Fi in the 2.4 GHz band in accordance with the 802.11g standard (Wi-Fi 3), in the 5 GHz band in accordance with the 802.11a standard (Wi-Fi 2). Let me remind you once again that the maximum channel connection speed (Data Rates) in these standards is 54 Mbps!
3) The actual data transfer rate will be approximately 2-3 times lower than the channel speed; in 802.11a/g standards, the maximum achievable actual transfer speed is approximately 20 Mbps (under ideal conditions). Basically, according to this article How Much Speed Do I Need to Stream Music? this is enough for streaming Hi-Res Lossless music. I specifically downloaded the track “Bad” Michael Jackson from Apple Music (103.3 MB) on the SE300 and it took about 40 seconds, 103.3 MB multiplied by 8 = 826.4 Mb divided by 40 (download time) ~ 20.66 Mbps.
4) The specification listed on the website astellnkern.com states that the Wi-Fi standard of the SE300 is 802.11a/b/g/n/ac (2.4/5 GHz) aka Wi-Fi 5. In reality, the connection occurs in accordance with the standards 802.11a (Wi-Fi 2) - the year the standard was adopted in 1999 and 802.11g (Wi-Fi 3) - the year the standard was adopted in 2003. Let me remind you that the device was released in 2023. Where Astell&Kern unearthed a wireless chip with such characteristics is a mystery to me these days; I still hope for a software error or a deliberate reduction in capabilities at the software level.
5) I scrolled through the forums and found the only message from user SE300 about a similar problem - post from CharlyBrown
6) I decided to dig further and found messages from SE180 users, they also report that the maximum speed is 54 Mbps (I am sure that they report the Link Speed value, that is, the channel speed). The specification listed on the website astellnkern.com states that the SE180's Wi-Fi standard is 802.11b/g/n (2.4GHz) aka Wi-Fi 4. Of course, I cannot know the characteristics of the wireless chip and Wi-Fi routers of users (I doubt that they use a Wi-Fi router of the Wi-Fi 3 generation), but the maximum channel speed in the 802.11n standard is:
- 72 Mbps (20 Mhz, 1SS)
- 144 Mbps (20 Mhz, 2SS)
- 150 Mbps (40 Mhz, 1SS)
- 300 Mbps (40 Mhz, 2SS)
This means that the SE180 also connects to Wi-Fi in accordance with the 802.11g standard! I don’t want to make such a conclusion, but it turns out that this is not the first time that Astell&Kern “lies” (in quotes, because there may be problems with my device?) in a published specification?
post from peanutslab
post from Joebas
7) And finally, and most importantly, dear owners of SE300 and SE180, check the channel speed of the Wi-Fi connection (Link Speed). Does it exceed 54 Mbps?
8) I just want to figure it out:
- there is a problem with my device due to the fact that it not genuine? Or defective?
- the problem is that someone is specifying the specification incorrectly
9) For streaming in Apple Music, the specified speed (20 Mbps) should theoretically be enough, I don’t know if Apple Music has tracks with 32-bit/192kHz (24-bit/192kHz is available), let’s take the maximum (for 32-bit/192kHz 12 Mbps required). But here you need to take into account that 20 Mbps is at a channel speed of 54 Mbps. Radio broadcasting is a constantly changing environment, both in time and space; you shouldn’t rely too much on “theory” in terms of actual connection speed. In real conditions of noise, interference, distance from the Wi-Fi router, interference in the form of walls between you and the router, your channel speed in 802.11a/g standards may be lower - 48, 36, 24 Mbps (I will not indicate speeds lower than 12) , accordingly, the real speed will be less than 20 Mbps.
20 Mbps in ideal conditions is enough, but playback does not start immediately due to track caching. This is annoying, there is a fairly large delay, if the speed met the specifications it would be faster.
Device - Roon Ready, is this speed enough to play DSD256 (for example) from a NAS?
If I want to save a track to a device with Apple Music, I’m not satisfied with this speed in 2024.
10) I am attaching screenshots when connecting to a corporate network, the second device is an iPhone. So, you can see for yourself that the SE300 connects in accordance with 802.11a/g, the iPhone (as indicated in the specification) in accordance with 802.11ax standard.
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    190.5 KB · Views: 0
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    29.7 KB · Views: 0
  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    24.2 KB · Views: 0
  • 4.jpg
    4.jpg
    23.5 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Mar 5, 2024 at 4:20 PM Post #630 of 721
I think you are missing a couple of things about the used market. First, the SE 300 is no longer the newest device offered by the company and so it’s value relative to other newer products, including yet another new one just announced, is going to depreciate.

Second, these players start off very high values, so they have more room to depreciate. Regardless of whether the player sounds good or not and is working well or not it is going to be very difficult for any device in the modern age to hold its value with technology moving forward so fast, especially when it starts off so expensive in the first place.

Think about how many new releases there have been since this released and how many keep coming, technology moves fast and competition is fierce.

Look at how the new Hiby R8ii and its alcantara case is drawing attention. Soon itll be a new hot thing.

Its not the SE300, its just modern tech.
Of course I agree with everything you said, but let me remind you that SE300 has not been released 3 or 4 years ago but only 9 months ago. This does not make it obsolete in particular if we know that there aren't a lot of R2R DAPs in the market. I am not aware of new R2R DAPs recently released. What I don't understand are people selling their device at half the price after using it 6 months or even less. Of course, they are free to sell at the price they want, but other DAPs do not depreciate that much so quickly
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top