do you remember the good old times? when the best, and imo still the best (he6, hd800, lcd2 v2), headphones in the world were very expensive?
@JaZZ well this my be it, the reason why the he6 is inefficient, and i guess the Susy too, it has almost nano grade membrane, and the conductive coating is also very very thin and made of gold, which means low mass and low conductivity makes it difficult to 'move a lot of air',
i guess the later, more efficient phones they made, all had ticker/wider conductive coating or perhaps even tick traces, thus being more efficient but also heavier,
but now, it would seem, they went back to the super low mass, low conductivity design to boost performance while sacrificing efficiency,
or maybe not @TeamHiFiMAN @Nankai what do u think?
@JaZZ well this my be it, the reason why the he6 is inefficient, and i guess the Susy too, it has almost nano grade membrane, and the conductive coating is also very very thin and made of gold, which means low mass and low conductivity makes it difficult to 'move a lot of air',
i guess the later, more efficient phones they made, all had ticker/wider conductive coating or perhaps even tick traces, thus being more efficient but also heavier,
but now, it would seem, they went back to the super low mass, low conductivity design to boost performance while sacrificing efficiency,
or maybe not @TeamHiFiMAN @Nankai what do u think?