I came here to find how this amp sounds, to other Hi-fi enthusiasts, and couldn't believe how many pages of pissing match I had to wade through in order to find a few snippets of how the damned thing sounds. For the numbers junkies, I think you can only tell so much from specs. How the sound actually manifests itself in use is what counts, not whether or not the specs are as good as should be. I remember finding a Stereo Review review of my Philips 212 turntable that I bought in 1977, in which the turntable was measured to verify the mfg. specs, but not one record was played to evaluate it's performance. I actually bought it after hearing my friends Philips for a couple of years prior, so the article mentioned didn't have an effect on my purchase. The point being, is that no matter what they give for specs, a listen is the only test that counts. Even $50,000 loudspeakers have shortcomings, and at that price they ought to sound perfect, IMHO. Many things contribute to the magic found in any good amp, such as synergy between components that are used to build the amp. How does it sound, and does it give an honest rendering of the recording, that's what I want to know. From the few opinions I've seen here, the Continental sounds like it does the job and competes with other portable amps of good reputation. As far as sub-40Hz tones go, not much is recorded down that deep, so it'll never be a deal breaker for me. It's more important to me that an acoustic bass sounds like one, and can be distinguished from an electric bass or keyboard. No matter the specs, it has to sound good, has to sound right, and if it does, I'm in. Try to figure it out, guys, because most of this thread is worthless rant that serves nobody. Thanks. Steve.