Quote:
Originally Posted by BrookR1 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
These things really kick butt with shoegaze. This music by nature is light, airy, cavernous, but laden with distant guitars faraway drumbeats, and sometimes synthesizers. Emphasis is on the highs and the MS-1s really work well. They bring out the detail in the instruments that are placed way back behind the others. You can pick out each instrument when listening to the wall of sound. If you get a chance, listen to some songs by Lush, the Cocteau Twins, Kitchens of Distinction, Ultra Vivid Scene and other types of dream pop/shoegaze.
I still prefer my SR-80s for harder bass-laden rock like the Arctic Monkeys, Van Halen, and NIN. There's a bit more punch to the music for the trade off of a little less detail.
|
DISCLAIMER: all of the observations in the following paragraph involve the use of
bowl pads for both the SR-80s & MS-1s. Both cans had 48-72 hours of cumulative burn in time (music & pink noise).
BrookR1: I agree with the overall spirit of your assessment although I find the MS-1 highs a shade less edgy (read: painful) than the SR-80s to my ears. Still, they are pretty close. These cans are great with music like you describe, a well as folk & acoustic rock. To my ears, they are also better performers with classical music than my SR-80s. The SR-80s were far too bright with intense string/brass based classical, with the mids getting drowned out from time to time. However, the SR-80s are better at harder, bassy rock...really impactful punch! The impact & bass punch of the MS-1 can be improved by the use of bowls (IMO)...not as good as the SR-80s, but certainly acceptable, especially since I find that the MS-1's slightly less shrilly highs (IMO) and more articulate mids are significant improvements to my ears. A more 'refined' sound perhaps?
Bottom line, I am pleased I replaced my SR-80s with the MS-1s, but I do miss the SR-80s when I am having a serious rock-out session. Note, I was not 'blown away' by the sound of the MS-1 over the SR-80, but the MS-1s are more compatible with the wide range of musical genres represented in my collection. Also, because the MS-1s have better neutrality, they can be competently morphed into different sound signatures using different pads without being overly excessive in the lows, mids, or highs. If the return period on my SR-80s had expired, it probably wouldn't have been worth it to replace them with the MS-1s (I would have gone to the SR-225s), but I am glad that I was able to do so without significant financial repercussions.