swt61
Dr. Wood
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2005
- Posts
- 5,308
- Likes
- 27
Quote:
I would consider both a classic. They both did something that was untried, and in both cases i believe they pulled it off! But to say the K340 isn't revolutionary is kind of silly. You don't have to completely reinvent something to take it to a new level. I wouldn't consider the K1000's revolutionary, as Philodox pointed out they are basicaly speakers attached to a framework. It's the fact that they sound so damn good that makes them a classic! IMHO i have not heard a headphone that made me say, "OK, the K340's are obsolete". They sound as good or better than most newer "Top Dog" headphones i've heard. That's my oppinion of coarse!
And JunktionFET, I think "famous K340" would be more accurate than "infamous".
Originally Posted by J-Pak Then I guess we'll have to disagree To me combining a electrostatic/dynamic hybrid isn't as revolutionary as a headphone that literally is an earspeaker; one where you can manipulate the listening experience based on how you position the drivers. If the K340 was the first electrostatic headphone then I would be much more impresssed. |
I would consider both a classic. They both did something that was untried, and in both cases i believe they pulled it off! But to say the K340 isn't revolutionary is kind of silly. You don't have to completely reinvent something to take it to a new level. I wouldn't consider the K1000's revolutionary, as Philodox pointed out they are basicaly speakers attached to a framework. It's the fact that they sound so damn good that makes them a classic! IMHO i have not heard a headphone that made me say, "OK, the K340's are obsolete". They sound as good or better than most newer "Top Dog" headphones i've heard. That's my oppinion of coarse!
And JunktionFET, I think "famous K340" would be more accurate than "infamous".