You should feel lucky that you caught that! How was it?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
☯️ Cavalli Audio's Liquid Carbon... a $599 Cavalli amp???
- Thread starter warrenpchi
- Start date
DigitalFreak
镇老鹰
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2011
- Posts
- 7,076
- Likes
- 774
You should feel lucky that you caught that! How was it?
pretty darn good. I wish I had more time with the Paradox in balanced. I'm not completely sure but i think the midrange sounded slightly more forward then what I'm used to. Sometimes when the midrange sounds cleaner I mistake it for sounding forward.
aamefford
I have a custom title!
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2007
- Posts
- 3,914
- Likes
- 661
During my search for a nice, right sized DAC to use with the liquid carbon, I have run across the Emotiva DC-1. I point it out, as it's specs state "Pro level output at the balanced output". This pro level output is +6 dbV. Is this excessive for the liquid carbon? In other words, is the gain going to end up being way too high with this level? I want to avoid running too high of a signal into the amp, and not having enough volume travel to adequately adjust volume on sensitive headphones, or conversely, too low of a signal, and having to crank the volume to near max to get to listenable levels. Comments appreciated!
Did the Carbon in the shows recently have a muting relay for those who heard it? still interested to know if there is one, or one planned for it in the future.
MattTCG
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2012
- Posts
- 15,685
- Likes
- 3,874
If the output level is +6 fixed, then I'd say it's too much.
aamefford
I have a custom title!
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2007
- Posts
- 3,914
- Likes
- 661
During my search for a nice, right sized DAC to use with the liquid carbon, I have run across the Emotiva DC-1. I point it out, as it's specs state "Pro level output at the balanced output". This pro level output is +6 dbV. Is this excessive for the liquid carbon? In other words, is the gain going to end up being way too high with this level? I want to avoid running too high of a signal into the amp, and not having enough volume travel to adequately adjust volume on sensitive headphones, or conversely, too low of a signal, and having to crank the volume to near max to get to listenable levels. Comments appreciated!
If the output level is +6 fixed, then I'd say it's too much.
I found the following calculator: http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-db-volt.htm
Doing my best trained monkey imitation (no offense to any trained monkeys in the audience) I see that +6 dbV is essentially 2 vrms. This is kinda sorta the input voltage standard, isn't it?
Dr. Cavalli - care to weigh in on what would be "reasonable" input levels for the balanced and single ended inputs?
MattTCG
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2012
- Posts
- 15,685
- Likes
- 3,874
Occasionally I'd like to have use of my momentum 2 at the desktop for isolation when the house is noisy-busy. Is there any reason why the Carbon would not pair well with this headphone?
nudd
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 2, 2013
- Posts
- 702
- Likes
- 108
I found the following calculator: http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-db-volt.htm
Doing my best trained monkey imitation (no offense to any trained monkeys in the audience) I see that +6 dbV is essentially 2 vrms. This is kinda sorta the input voltage standard, isn't it?
Dr. Cavalli - care to weigh in on what would be "reasonable" input levels for the balanced and single ended inputs?
Studio level line out references +4 dbU, so I think that is 1.2 v. +6 dbV would be quite a bit higher than that, so I suspect that it is a bit higher than what would be expected.
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2008
- Posts
- 5,050
- Likes
- 894
During my search for a nice, right sized DAC to use with the liquid carbon, I have run across the Emotiva DC-1. I point it out, as it's specs state "Pro level output at the balanced output". This pro level output is +6 dbV. Is this excessive for the liquid carbon? In other words, is the gain going to end up being way too high with this level? I want to avoid running too high of a signal into the amp, and not having enough volume travel to adequately adjust volume on sensitive headphones, or conversely, too low of a signal, and having to crank the volume to near max to get to listenable levels. Comments appreciated!
Emotiva now has a rep on board here. Let's see if this works.....
@KeithEmo ?
stjj89
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2013
- Posts
- 591
- Likes
- 91
Does anyone have an opinion on whether the Liquid Carbon would be a good match for the TH900 (running single-ended)?
DigitalFreak
镇老鹰
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2011
- Posts
- 7,076
- Likes
- 774
I found the following calculator: http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-db-volt.htm
Doing my best trained monkey imitation (no offense to any trained monkeys in the audience) I see that +6 dbV is essentially 2 vrms. This is kinda sorta the input voltage standard, isn't it?
Dr. Cavalli - care to weigh in on what would be "reasonable" input levels for the balanced and single ended inputs?
How about us monkeys who are still in training? We're not just a bunch second bananas bud.
jjacq
Playing Upgraditis Mania
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2012
- Posts
- 1,121
- Likes
- 288
To those who have heard the carbon, do you guys think it'd be something that can contend with the Schiit Mjolnir?
aarontyson
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2015
- Posts
- 53
- Likes
- 15
Having never heard the Schiit Mjolnir, I would think they are very different amps. For one the Mjolnir has more power and probably has a completely different Topolgy. I would think the Cavalli would sound similar or better IMO. Hopefully someone who knows will reply.
dusk
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2005
- Posts
- 267
- Likes
- 23
screw it, just bought one
Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)