Show us your vintage headphones!
Jun 22, 2017 at 11:43 AM Post #2,056 of 3,123
Bought in 1999/2000, with my first paycheck. Reached almost 20 years of fun.
Those were the years shortly before Head-Fi appeared.

C360_2016-08-14-16-36-16-845.jpg
C360_2016-08-14-14-29-21-382.jpg
20170129_132513.jpg
20161203_140538.jpg
 
Last edited:
Jun 22, 2017 at 2:54 PM Post #2,057 of 3,123
JVC HA-D990 DIGITAL REFERENCE

JPEG_20170622_144538.jpg JPEG_20170622_144711.jpg
JPEG_20170622_144553.jpg JPEG_20170622_144609.jpg

These are a studio monitor in the same vein as the MDR-V6 and the like. Normally I don't bother with stuff like this, but @nick n has been nagging me to try one for a while now so I figured I might as well grab the next cheap one I saw.

D990A.png


They're ok. Slightly bright, which is not necessarily a bad thing. Very clean and resolving in the midrange, with spot on timbre from bass to lower treble. Mid treble and up goes a bit off, sounding rather "plasticky" and hard. No top octave (>10kHz) though they do image well and maintain a good sense of space for a closed headphone. Bass doesn't reach super deep but has decent dynamic range and correct timbre.

The midrange is keeping me listening to these longer than I expected. Will likely play around with these a bit.
 
Jun 22, 2017 at 7:31 PM Post #2,058 of 3,123
!

Are you getting a good seal? I find I have to tilt the band back slightly to get a fit correct.
Definitely a bit of futzing.
Often the small cup wires get caught behind the hinge and cups and I don't notice that the fit is goofy.
Creative bending of the sliders helps also.

and also thanks for those charts.
 
Last edited:
Jun 22, 2017 at 8:01 PM Post #2,059 of 3,123
Fit was def. odd but I had no issue getting a seal on either my head or the rig. There was some decayed foam in the right side that was missing from the left, so I removed it before taking the final measurement. There was more bass with the foam in, but still the same amount of roll-off. Better without the foam, tbh.

I'll take a low noise floor measurement tonight; distortion below 100Hz should be ignored until then.
 
Jun 22, 2017 at 9:01 PM Post #2,060 of 3,123
JVC HA-D990 DIGITAL REFERENCE

They're ok. Slightly bright, which is not necessarily a bad thing. Very clean and resolving in the midrange, with spot on timbre from bass to lower treble. Mid treble and up goes a bit off, sounding rather "plasticky" and hard. No top octave (>10kHz) though they do image well and maintain a good sense of space for a closed headphone. Bass doesn't reach super deep but has decent dynamic range and correct timbre.

The midrange is keeping me listening to these longer than I expected. Will likely play around with these a bit.

I have to thank nick as well :)

I put on my Yamaha MT-220 pads on the HA-D990. Very comfortable with a better seal. Love the sound.
 
Jun 23, 2017 at 10:32 AM Post #2,061 of 3,123
20150204_163251.jpg
20150204_163319.jpg
20150204_163251.jpg
20150204_163319.jpg
A new, surprisingly good headphone arrived today:
'Prefer HD 95 Studio Monitor Series' - Ultra Light, Rare Earth Metal Super Magnet'
Wonderfully balanced smooth sound with just enough lack of bass to add a touch more mids than being completely flat. I bough them for monitoring in the studio as the Sony MDR V6 can get a bit too warm in summer months. From what I have heard they should be perfect :) with the bonus that they with their nice relaxed easy to listen to tone that are also great for music

Looks almost identical to the 'Maruni' [is that the name?] brand

2n0supx.jpg



2hn6mgz.jpg

My Murani HV-3000R.
 
Last edited:
Jun 24, 2017 at 9:01 AM Post #2,062 of 3,123
.
 

Attachments

  • _DSC8252.jpg
    _DSC8252.jpg
    702.5 KB · Views: 0
  • _DSC8259.jpg
    _DSC8259.jpg
    457.4 KB · Views: 0
  • _DSC8273.jpg
    _DSC8273.jpg
    472.3 KB · Views: 0
  • _DSC8267.jpg
    _DSC8267.jpg
    506.4 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Jun 24, 2017 at 9:42 AM Post #2,063 of 3,123
Those Grundig's look interesting with the sort of megaphone enclosures. Almost looks like a Dieter Rams design. How do they sound?
 
Jun 24, 2017 at 9:57 AM Post #2,064 of 3,123
Honestly, they're a little bit meh, but the best of the bunch. (Even a stock Pioneer SE-2 sounds better)
A few too many resonances in the cups. and definitely in some need of EQ for a balanced FR... I don't think any damping or pad rolling would quite cut it, but it might help, especially with these plastic pads.
Still better than any Telefunken wannabe-high-end nonsense I've posted in the past... they have somewhat similar drivers to the telefunkens, in size and appearance.
But I do think it's more than just better implementation.

But still, nothing to chase if you're after some quick-good sound. These require work, and I have no idea how good they can sound either... only had them for a short while and havn't tried anything other than some very simple EQ.
 
Jun 24, 2017 at 12:35 PM Post #2,065 of 3,123
IMG_20170624_121123248_HDR.jpg

My small vintage collection. Really just got the itch a few months ago and started casually browsing eBay for ones that piqued my interest. From left to right:

Pioneer SE-500: These are strange. Dunno if like them or not. I'm mostly withholding judgement until I have the time to fix them up a bit, the cord is pretty well shot and the pads are even worse. Also I'm not sure if my headphone amp is the proper driver for these, or if I should recable them to use speaker taps. Got 'em for $25.

Stanton Dynaphase Sixty: Big and heavy. Comically so. But they have bass for days, basically a '70s version of the HA-SZ2000 bass-cannons we have now: separate woofer and tweeter. Sound pretty good, but I need to pack the cups with some tack to get rid of the clamshell effect. Also I'm willing to bet the capacitors are pretty knackered too. Picked these up for $30.

AKG K340: Wow these are good. Like, really good. All I've done is replace the worn out stock pads with "new" ones (the stock pads off my K550s that were collecting dust. They fit like a charm!) and these easily pass my Q701s in pretty much everything except sheer soundstage. Maybe bass depth too, but not impact if that makes sense. I also need to look into replacing the elastic, it's there for looks only at the moment. These were the most expensive of my pickups at a whopping $90.
 
Last edited:
Jun 25, 2017 at 2:52 AM Post #2,066 of 3,123


AKG K340: Wow these are good. Like, really good. All I've done is replace the worn out stock pads with "new" ones (the stock pads off my K550s that were collecting dust. They fit like a charm!) and these easily pass my Q701s in pretty much everything except sheer soundstage. Maybe bass depth too, but not impact if that makes sense. I also need to look into replacing the elastic, it's there for looks only at the moment. These were the most expensive of my pickups at a whopping $90.

K340's are an underrated steal! I think you have to spend closer to $1,000 to really equal or surpass them. They give my HE500 a work over on many genres of music
 
Jun 25, 2017 at 3:03 AM Post #2,067 of 3,123
K340's are an underrated steal! I think you have to spend closer to $1,000 to really equal or surpass them. They give my HE500 a work over on many genres of music

Interesting...
I'd say they're a massively overrated vintage headphone with ridiculously inflated resale prices and you'd have to spend $30 or more to equal or surpass them.
Each to their own.
 
Jun 25, 2017 at 3:08 AM Post #2,068 of 3,123
Interesting...
I'd say they're a massively overrated vintage headphone with ridiculously inflated resale prices and you'd have to spend $30 or more to equal or surpass them.
Each to their own.


I got mine for $30 and I rarely see them on my local craigslist for more than $150 CAD. I agree to each their own though; its quite possible the ones you heard were shot or that my love for AKG and dislike of sennheiser's is clouding my judgement.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top