jook
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2007
- Posts
- 59
- Likes
- 6
The Zune software has quirks, but I find it much more tolerable than iTunes (which I find intolerable). It depends on how you work, I guess. I only want to use it for transferring my music to the Zune, and not to be my super media library centerpiece, and that is what it does well. As opposed to iTunes, which forces itself to be that centerpiece, and would not accept being anything else.
For example, the Zune software allows you to copy music out of the Zune and onto the HD. That makes much sense. iTunes does not. If you plug the Zune into another computer, it suggests to connect it as a Guest and not sync it, or you can reattach the Zune to this new computer and sync it. Very sensible.
But Zune software would have silly (technically minor) quirks like picking up id3v1 tags when id3v2 tags are available. Not a huge problem if you understand how it works, but extremely confusing if you're not so technically familiar/capable of recognizing this as the reason (you'd just sit there and wonder why the album is named wrong - it's because your id3v1 tag is wrong, and you're looking at the id3v2 tag in your tagging program).
For example, the Zune software allows you to copy music out of the Zune and onto the HD. That makes much sense. iTunes does not. If you plug the Zune into another computer, it suggests to connect it as a Guest and not sync it, or you can reattach the Zune to this new computer and sync it. Very sensible.
But Zune software would have silly (technically minor) quirks like picking up id3v1 tags when id3v2 tags are available. Not a huge problem if you understand how it works, but extremely confusing if you're not so technically familiar/capable of recognizing this as the reason (you'd just sit there and wonder why the album is named wrong - it's because your id3v1 tag is wrong, and you're looking at the id3v2 tag in your tagging program).